($INBOX_DIR/description missing)
 help / color / Atom feed
* syncfs improvement for overlayfs
@ 2019-09-27  9:15 admin
  2020-01-24 14:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: admin @ 2019-09-27  9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: miklos; +Cc: linux-unionfs, cgxu519

Hi Miklos,

It's been a while since I posted my last version of syncfs improvement patch[1]
and I noticed it isn't get merged yet. If you think this patch is still valuable then
I would like to do rebase on latest overlayfs tree and resend for review.
What do you think?


[1]
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-unionfs/msg04174.html

Thanks,
Chengguang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: syncfs improvement for overlayfs
  2019-09-27  9:15 syncfs improvement for overlayfs admin
@ 2020-01-24 14:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
  2020-01-30  3:17   ` admin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2020-01-24 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cgxu519; +Cc: linux-unionfs

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:15 AM admin <cgxu519@zoho.com.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi Miklos,
>
> It's been a while since I posted my last version of syncfs improvement patch[1]
> and I noticed it isn't get merged yet. If you think this patch is still valuable then
> I would like to do rebase on latest overlayfs tree and resend for review.
> What do you think?


Hi,

Sorry, this has fallen off my radar.  Can you please rebase and resend?

Thanks,
Miklos

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: syncfs improvement for overlayfs
  2020-01-24 14:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
@ 2020-01-30  3:17   ` admin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: admin @ 2020-01-30  3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: linux-unionfs

 ---- 在 星期五, 2020-01-24 22:21:38 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> 撰写 ----
 > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:15 AM admin <cgxu519@zoho.com.cn> wrote:
 > >
 > > Hi Miklos,
 > >
 > > It's been a while since I posted my last version of syncfs improvement patch[1]
 > > and I noticed it isn't get merged yet. If you think this patch is still valuable then
 > > I would like to do rebase on latest overlayfs tree and resend for review.
 > > What do you think?
 > 
 > 
 > Hi,
 > 
 > Sorry, this has fallen off my radar.  Can you please rebase and resend?
 > 

Thanks for your response, I'll do it soon.

Chengguang


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-27  9:15 syncfs improvement for overlayfs admin
2020-01-24 14:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-01-30  3:17   ` admin

($INBOX_DIR/description missing)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/0 linux-unionfs/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-unionfs linux-unionfs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs \
		linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-unionfs

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git