From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CEAC33C9E for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 03:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F026D206D5 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 03:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726692AbgA3DcW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:32:22 -0500 Received: from sender2-pp-o92.zoho.com.cn ([163.53.93.251]:25347 "EHLO sender2-pp-o92.zoho.com.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726485AbgA3DcW (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:32:22 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 905 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:32:20 EST Received: from mail.baihui.com by mx.zoho.com.cn with SMTP id 1580354223117734.9393452627133; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:17:03 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:17:03 +0800 From: admin Reply-To: cgxu519@mykernel.net To: "Miklos Szeredi" Cc: "linux-unionfs" Message-ID: <16ff473bc09.e9ea67252776.7817870406116452896@zoho.com.cn> In-Reply-To: References: <16d7200e45c.1398c37e020790.5506577327176178828@zoho.com.cn> Subject: Re: syncfs improvement for overlayfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Priority: Medium User-Agent: ZohoCN Mail X-Mailer: ZohoCN Mail Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org ---- 在 星期五, 2020-01-24 22:21:38 Miklos Szeredi 撰写 ---- > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:15 AM admin wrote: > > > > Hi Miklos, > > > > It's been a while since I posted my last version of syncfs improvement patch[1] > > and I noticed it isn't get merged yet. If you think this patch is still valuable then > > I would like to do rebase on latest overlayfs tree and resend for review. > > What do you think? > > > Hi, > > Sorry, this has fallen off my radar. Can you please rebase and resend? > Thanks for your response, I'll do it soon. Chengguang