From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: "overlayfs" <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ovl: skip checking lower file's write permisson on truncate
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:04:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17ac4a9585a.fe9d56d860292.2175453677488603990@mykernel.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvmMtXPg1qMznuimy27maqGxOtcddR-L0MUfAS6jwhE7Q@mail.gmail.com>
---- 在 星期三, 2021-07-21 00:01:11 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> 撰写 ----
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 17:19, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
> > So on one instance a file on lower gets executed and on another
> > instance sharing the lower layer the file is truncated. The truncate
> > is currently denied due to the negative i_writecount on the lower
> > file. Also behavior is inconsistent between open(path, O_TRUNC) and
> > truncate(path) even though the two should be equivalent.
> >
> > Applied with the following description:
> >
> [...]
>
> Also adding the following documentation in the "Non-standard behavior" section:
>
> c) If a file residing on a lower layer is being executed, then opening that
> file for write or truncating the file will not be denied with ETXTBSY.
>
> Looked at the POSIX standard and it only documents ETXTBUSY for O_RDWR
> and O_WRONLY and not for truncate(2) or O_TRUNC. So strictly speaking
> this patch doesn't even change the POSIX correctness.
>
Hi Miklos,
Thanks for doing this too.
Thanks,
Chengguang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-20 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-24 14:03 [RFC PATCH 1/2] ovl: skip checking lower file's write permisson on truncate Chengguang Xu
2021-04-24 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ovl: enhance write permission check for writable open Chengguang Xu
2021-07-21 13:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-04-28 12:18 ` 回复:[RFC PATCH 1/2] ovl: skip checking lower file's write permisson on truncate Chengguang Xu
2021-07-20 14:35 ` [RFC " Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-20 15:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-20 16:01 ` Chengguang Xu
2021-07-20 16:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-20 16:04 ` Chengguang Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17ac4a9585a.fe9d56d860292.2175453677488603990@mykernel.net \
--to=cgxu519@mykernel.net \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).