From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
syzbot <syzbot+d6ec23007e951dadf3de@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] hugetlb: use f_mode & FMODE_HUGETLBFS to identify hugetlbfs files
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 07:38:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200613143854.GN8681@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxg=o2SVbfUiz0nOg-XHG8irvAsnXzFWjExjubk2v_6c_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 09:53:24AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Currently, the only in-tree stacking fs are overlayfs and ecryptfs, but there
> are some out of tree implementations as well (shiftfs).
> So you may only take that option if you do not care about the combination
> of hugetlbfs with any of the above.
I could see shiftfs being interesting, maybe. I don't really see
the usecase for layering overlayfs or ecryptfs on top of a ram-based
filesystem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-13 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-12 0:46 [PATCH v4 1/2] hugetlb: use f_mode & FMODE_HUGETLBFS to identify hugetlbfs files Mike Kravetz
2020-06-12 0:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ovl: call underlying get_unmapped_area() routine. propogate FMODE_HUGETLBFS Mike Kravetz
2020-06-14 12:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-12 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] hugetlb: use f_mode & FMODE_HUGETLBFS to identify hugetlbfs files Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-12 1:58 ` Al Viro
2020-06-12 21:51 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-06-13 6:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-13 14:38 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-06-13 19:12 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-06-15 7:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-06-15 10:05 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-15 13:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-06-15 23:45 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-06-16 9:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-06-15 8:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-06-15 17:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-06-12 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH] hugetlb: hugetlbfs_file_operations can be static kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200613143854.GN8681@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=syzbot+d6ec23007e951dadf3de@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=walters@verbum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).