From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C843AC433DB for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1E3229C6 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727735AbgLVQTo (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:19:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56702 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727647AbgLVQTn (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:19:43 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F6CC061793; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:19:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=wQR/YgBWhGYrRRqTF0BOEXEvKg/409uuplzpqhvAfKE=; b=c4UFcqjSsnoRISaP7DnxM5hrVx /cVdi2XikxsfNoGUsy/3QVJ1u39j5POoDySKkAQbFURDUvtcF8ZYPFkABcM7RlGWcfa19hUCNipf1 hBMcwE/UFQpFOQwhLB1Gbk4Ws524uMAsmB6yQj5aMZAadQChx5dFCtko6GAZuec9PvO5ACjnwAQOW PyFb/KAhWeXBH9LcI8SHlyQoRHNCbTVz9AiphEBQ75b1BhaKpEoOYG6tfqrNEorqlmvUYufjoZtLp Kx5jAFYiDPLDIfOwgsec8E4dWWQQ/DRPd47IIk8FyZw+3tHi+TbKU80PFKIfQp8NN6b49B4JJBL3N k8Nd684A==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1krkNI-0004VE-TL; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:19:00 +0000 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:19:00 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Vivek Goyal Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org, amir73il@gmail.com, sargun@sargun.me, miklos@szeredi.hu, jack@suse.cz, neilb@suse.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] vfs: Add a super block operation to check for writeback errors Message-ID: <20201222161900.GI874@casper.infradead.org> References: <20201221195055.35295-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> <20201221195055.35295-3-vgoyal@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201221195055.35295-3-vgoyal@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:50:54PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > - ret2 = errseq_check_and_advance(&sb->s_wb_err, &f.file->f_sb_err); > + if (sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance) > + ret2 = sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance(sb, f.file); What a terrible name for an fs operation. You don't seem to be able to distinguish between semantics and implementation. How about check_error()?