linux-unionfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
	overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] overlayfs: Provide a mount option "volatile" to skip sync
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 20:42:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8kamfuo.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106190325.GB1445528@redhat.com> (Vivek Goyal's message of "Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:03:25 -0500")

Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>
> [..]
>> There is some slightly confusing behaviour here [I realize this
>> behaviour is as intended]:
>> 
>> (root) ~ # mount -t overlay -o
>> volatile,index=off,lowerdir=/root/lowerdir,upperdir=/root/upperdir,workdir=/root/workdir
>> none /mnt/foo
>> (root) ~ # umount /mnt/foo
>> (root) ~ # mount -t overlay -o
>> volatile,index=off,lowerdir=/root/lowerdir,upperdir=/root/upperdir,workdir=/root/workdir
>> none /mnt/foo
>> mount: /mnt/foo: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on none,
>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
>> 
>> From my understanding, the dirty flag should only be a problem if the
>> existing overlayfs is unmounted uncleanly. Docker does
>> this (mount, and re-mounts) during startup time because it writes some
>> files to the overlayfs. I think that we should harden
>> the volatile check slightly, and make it so that within the same boot,
>> it's not a problem, and having to have the user clear
>> the workdir every time is a pain. In addition, the semantics of the
>> volatile patch itself do not appear to be such that they
>> would break mounts during the same boot / mount of upperdir -- as
>> overlayfs does not defer any writes in itself, and it's
>> only that it's short-circuiting writes to the upperdir.
>
> umount does a sync normally and with "volatile" overlayfs skips that
> sync. So a successful unmount does not mean that file got synced
> to backing store. It is possible, after umount, system crashed
> and after reboot, user tried to mount upper which is corrupted
> now and overlay will not detect it.
>
> You seem to be asking for an alternate option where we disable
> fsync() but not syncfs. In that case sync on umount will still
> be done. And that means a successful umount should mean upper
> is fine and it could automatically remove incomapt dir upon
> umount.

could this be handled in user space?  It should still be possible to do
the equivalent of:

# sync -f /root/upperdir
# rm -rf /root/workdir/incompat/volatile

Regards,
Giuseppe


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-31 18:15 [PATCH v7] overlayfs: Provide a mount option "volatile" to skip sync Vivek Goyal
2020-09-01  8:22 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-09-01 13:14   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 17:58 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-06 19:00   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-06 19:20     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:22     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:25       ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-09 19:39         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-09 20:24           ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 19:03   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 19:42     ` Giuseppe Scrivano [this message]
2020-11-07  9:35       ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-07 11:52         ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-09 20:40           ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09  8:53         ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-11-09 10:10           ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-09 16:36         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:09         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:20           ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o8kamfuo.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=sargun@sargun.me \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).