From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] ovl: copy up sync/noatime fileattr flags
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:20:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegv89zStsDSWmY39YiF=aZVyO=rOYFU5_VBHxu-H_h-_dQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210619092619.1107608-4-amir73il@gmail.com>
On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 11:26, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When a lower file has sync/noatime fileattr flags, the behavior of
> overlayfs post copy up is inconsistent.
>
> Immediattely after copy up, ovl inode still has the S_SYNC/S_NOATIME
> inode flags copied from lower inode, so vfs code still treats the ovl
> inode as sync/noatime. After ovl inode evict or mount cycle,
> the ovl inode does not have these inode flags anymore.
>
> To fix this inconsitency, try to copy the fileattr flags on copy up
> if the upper fs supports the fileattr_set() method.
>
> This gives consistent behavior post copy up regardless of inode eviction
> from cache.
>
> We cannot copy up the immutable/append-only inode flags in a similar
> manner, because immutable/append-only inodes cannot be linked and because
> overlayfs will not be able to set overlay.* xattr on the upper inodes.
>
> Those flags will be addressed by a followup patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> fs/overlayfs/inode.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> index 3fa68a5cc16e..a06b423ca5d1 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/fileattr.h>
> #include <linux/splice.h>
> #include <linux/xattr.h>
> #include <linux/security.h>
> @@ -130,6 +131,31 @@ int ovl_copy_xattr(struct super_block *sb, struct dentry *old,
> return error;
> }
>
> +static int ovl_copy_fileattr(struct path *old, struct path *new)
> +{
> + struct fileattr oldfa = { .flags_valid = true };
> + struct fileattr newfa = { .flags_valid = true };
> + int err;
> +
> + err = ovl_real_fileattr(old, &oldfa, false);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = ovl_real_fileattr(new, &newfa, false);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(OVL_COPY_FS_FLAGS_MASK & ~FS_COMMON_FL);
> + newfa.flags &= ~OVL_COPY_FS_FLAGS_MASK;
> + newfa.flags |= (oldfa.flags & OVL_COPY_FS_FLAGS_MASK);
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(OVL_COPY_FSX_FLAGS_MASK & ~FS_XFLAG_COMMON);
> + newfa.fsx_xflags &= ~OVL_COPY_FSX_FLAGS_MASK;
> + newfa.fsx_xflags |= (oldfa.fsx_xflags & OVL_COPY_FSX_FLAGS_MASK);
> +
> + return ovl_real_fileattr(new, &newfa, true);
> +}
> +
> static int ovl_copy_up_data(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct path *old,
> struct path *new, loff_t len)
> {
> @@ -493,20 +519,21 @@ static int ovl_link_up(struct ovl_copy_up_ctx *c)
> static int ovl_copy_up_inode(struct ovl_copy_up_ctx *c, struct dentry *temp)
> {
> struct ovl_fs *ofs = OVL_FS(c->dentry->d_sb);
> + struct inode *inode = d_inode(c->dentry);
> + struct path upperpath, datapath;
> int err;
>
> + ovl_path_upper(c->dentry, &upperpath);
> + if (WARN_ON(upperpath.dentry != NULL))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + upperpath.dentry = temp;
> +
> /*
> * Copy up data first and then xattrs. Writing data after
> * xattrs will remove security.capability xattr automatically.
> */
> if (S_ISREG(c->stat.mode) && !c->metacopy) {
> - struct path upperpath, datapath;
> -
> - ovl_path_upper(c->dentry, &upperpath);
> - if (WARN_ON(upperpath.dentry != NULL))
> - return -EIO;
> - upperpath.dentry = temp;
> -
> ovl_path_lowerdata(c->dentry, &datapath);
> err = ovl_copy_up_data(ofs, &datapath, &upperpath,
> c->stat.size);
> @@ -518,6 +545,14 @@ static int ovl_copy_up_inode(struct ovl_copy_up_ctx *c, struct dentry *temp)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + if (inode->i_flags & OVL_COPY_I_FLAGS_MASK) {
> + /*
> + * Copy the fileattr inode flags that are the source of already
> + * copied i_flags (best effort).
> + */
> + ovl_copy_fileattr(&c->lowerpath, &upperpath);
I'm not sure this should be ignoring errors. Was this done to prevent
regressing cases where the upper fs cannot store the flags? Do you
have a concrete example?
Thanks,
Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-19 9:26 [PATCH v3 0/4] Overlayfs fileattr related fixes Amir Goldstein
2021-06-19 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] fs: add generic helper for filling statx attribute flags Amir Goldstein
2021-06-19 9:31 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-19 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ovl: pass ovl_fs to ovl_check_setxattr() Amir Goldstein
2021-06-19 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ovl: copy up sync/noatime fileattr flags Amir Goldstein
2021-07-12 14:20 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2021-07-12 15:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-12 15:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-14 8:47 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-14 10:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-19 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ovl: consistent behavior for immutable/append-only inodes Amir Goldstein
2021-07-12 12:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-12 13:43 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-19 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Overlayfs fileattr related fixes Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJfpegv89zStsDSWmY39YiF=aZVyO=rOYFU5_VBHxu-H_h-_dQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=cgxu519@mykernel.net \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).