From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Szeredi Subject: Re: syncfs improvement for overlayfs Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:21:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <16d7200e45c.1398c37e020790.5506577327176178828@zoho.com.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com ([209.85.166.53]:35410 "EHLO mail-io1-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392237AbgAXOVu (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:21:50 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id h8so2111509iob.2 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 06:21:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <16d7200e45c.1398c37e020790.5506577327176178828@zoho.com.cn> Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org To: cgxu519@zoho.com.cn Cc: linux-unionfs On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:15 AM admin wrote: > > Hi Miklos, > > It's been a while since I posted my last version of syncfs improvement patch[1] > and I noticed it isn't get merged yet. If you think this patch is still valuable then > I would like to do rebase on latest overlayfs tree and resend for review. > What do you think? Hi, Sorry, this has fallen off my radar. Can you please rebase and resend? Thanks, Miklos