From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E90C433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD83610A5 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231768AbhJFPfN (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:35:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231293AbhJFPfM (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:35:12 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65048C061755 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 08:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id g10so3357433vsb.8 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:33:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OXGlnNe1yWBSvNniecAJQ/P9MoZJY33TkoAKPrbYOnw=; b=hA1vk31Bhomcl0BX+2n4o1WOeiN/pLWbs/c79v0uZf04LtAu686+SXWgXbe/RDCfJo kfC8USdT7zxYZS2Jo9c0t57CZzmdZQt8Ydtax4fNW4v3ehrYS23mMWo/TbevMVGvt00q x6WbVkjN6p1MKRQ4u7UHz9vDf0OIYuEGqbt9w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OXGlnNe1yWBSvNniecAJQ/P9MoZJY33TkoAKPrbYOnw=; b=e+1Bjot0pdsRCTNstqPxA01EVT/qse5Hx3WH9Z1WrU9mtbAj+XjNSXj/5SCh8mOW+P v1rO6EP7mMotfvd1wirjq1yDdKRLlnBd4wZ+LRj2Y4TTa2oMFWueftNuE3xs/l3PeIdR sI4rbdqcXZYh9gspR9ZHHiDicJ6I8FprQaQX9QvpNcayNnqcTE/NAkrBf/36B03QAlIt Y+vgvRoSuAOSwAXLvgnmcedvs8gh4d+iKCZvv2HGJg2NDxT1SD9CPXxIXSTw+x3ZA0Yu KQ5TL9nQ6xFyAfZRPAEpynXlG13TVqU3nUyiRgZvx8kHRucLSi32ZdsZTFTZkcNGRqMJ q5Rw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533uo9DTo3wcb9/UTi/+wUu5e3JOf+Svui0kR2r4YK5ZccEkU9c6 HDorlJkQMIk7Uoe9F5QfxC/irkiMN5MOwTtloMPeBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiOjGX+elH6RoLYAfpIz6u9FQCAwQ90zgFM4YeOO/PwbB6PfGge44MGahOyC2VIBg+9pkmElcw9HXzY6DUn7A= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c284:: with SMTP id k4mr6631340vsj.24.1633534399452; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:33:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210923130814.140814-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net> <20210923130814.140814-4-cgxu519@mykernel.net> In-Reply-To: <20210923130814.140814-4-cgxu519@mykernel.net> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 17:33:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 03/10] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->evict_inode operation To: Chengguang Xu Cc: Jan Kara , Amir Goldstein , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, overlayfs , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 15:08, Chengguang Xu wrote: > > Implement overlayfs' ->evict_inode operation, > so that we can clear dirty flags of overlayfs inode. > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu > --- > fs/overlayfs/super.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c > index 51886ba6130a..2ab77adf7256 100644 > --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c > @@ -406,11 +406,18 @@ static int ovl_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) > return ret; > } > > +static void ovl_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) > +{ > + inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_ALL; > + clear_inode(inode); clear_inode() should already clear the dirty flags; the default eviction should work fine without having to define an ->evict_inode. What am I missing? Thanks, Miklos