From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amir Goldstein Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: fix wrong WARN_ON() in ovl_cache_update_ino() Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20191223064025.23801-1-amir73il@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:43489 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730310AbgAXGuB (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 01:50:01 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n21so856158ioo.10 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 22:50:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: overlayfs > I'm working this into the next batch bound for 5.6, unless something > more urgent comes up before that. > overlayfs-next tested. ovl-ino rebased. You would probably want to squash the "merge conflict" below to overlayfs-next. Thanks, Amir. --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c @@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ static int ovl_get_layers(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs, */ err = get_anon_bdev(&ofs->fs[0].pseudo_dev); if (err) { - pr_err("overlayfs: failed to get anonymous bdev for upper fs\n"); + pr_err("failed to get anonymous bdev for upper fs\n"); goto out; } @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ static int ovl_get_layers(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs, */ if (ofs->numfs - !ofs->upper_mnt == 1) { if (ofs->config.xino == OVL_XINO_ON) - pr_info("overlayfs: \"xino=on\" is useless with all layers on same fs, ignore.\n"); + pr_info("\"xino=on\" is useless with all layers on same fs, ignore.\n"); ofs->xino_mode = 0; } else if (ofs->config.xino == OVL_XINO_ON && ofs->xino_mode < 0) {