From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B149C433DF for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 16:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69D720643 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 16:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="EhUbq1iO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728041AbgEQQmo (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2020 12:42:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728038AbgEQQmo (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2020 12:42:44 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF17BC061A0C; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id d7so8008604ioq.5; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:42:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FE79B1sBhL7HCjYBuhTPYrTnaeatbUnZ5hvj8cInxOw=; b=EhUbq1iO+3UMjcqsJV9vy0zMiP2GtGSfbLMCCxu9iq5zkPO9wbjPKZXWqDWvEnib0M DAesjcHLEU46468FB2k5eRUuff8/Fld9yVIl8tJsM5s8r0j2a+f2yvC/ySCIpXPSNMXS MtNGbTSlFcVXEx6krRnZloxzMqCn+qz8X1gQ0rzC6TlIZH0HoTvlRPxbV5yeJiijqdOQ de+xpnT6zq+uKOMC5mFGiXZNxR0/6ullzAACM1HM0ga1kO926D4vUP8XQ6g9VC7bNXrf hRnBNqn+v3kEtWqe9ZSipGdawvRObdDoDZ0YEQRem2/YPr4YP/ZkBvKLRx+IRZSwjb7q 9dNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FE79B1sBhL7HCjYBuhTPYrTnaeatbUnZ5hvj8cInxOw=; b=M9BwH0UwjhWWILjkfsr1xvXJDkH0zv66iCeiuifHfHBpkPAxWOCI8jJVt0+cjteqpR 5QiYcQtHWidEo/2smwmSHxybyQzW9f0w4IZW24JtUeW+4oInPMizOUogzLXExNLgGcEm Rjx6FlfuO3q9ECQkM0YF/Dzeck9hpEEkbNmUe89z2QraUDt137ft0fjWfb+SfDJJzqOE Vyub++Ua1/85ph5l7FduGGAKJqSmtw8HOlszoJIF4DJwVb7u2U8jz+mZ3tLqGASmEcG2 8NFEAYWZT1YRRsfm2/1C8g4iws2JRkn7ZPPuL3yVsxcGaGmJgEAvW6QdxSJCspKu7bI7 iJjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ctd2zR/EXEE+VyM77SrkV8JryMUYt6ojgYbQoX7DtlqZlOYh3 tz/tCac+abR4CtjrgvfCV5sIvWUmPs9L4T4/BgSEJG2L X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznXQDThdd0HSYSGDA6uUxS+O905+vKl/E2RCDzAMc9oAHidP7iv/507SxCL06eptT29CITPhkj/NsGNMDuJl4= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8c95:: with SMTP id g21mr11110931ion.72.1589733763225; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:42:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200513192338.13584-1-amir73il@gmail.com> <20200517162418.GG2704@desktop> In-Reply-To: <20200517162418.GG2704@desktop> From: Amir Goldstein Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 19:42:32 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] overlay: test for whiteout inode sharing To: Eryu Guan Cc: Eryu Guan , Chengguang Xu , Miklos Szeredi , overlayfs , fstests Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 7:24 PM Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:23:38PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > From: Chengguang Xu > > > > This is a test for whiteout inode sharing feature. > > > > [Amir] added check for whiteout sharing support > > and whiteout of lower dir. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu > > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein > > --- > > > > Chengguang, > > > > I decided to take a stab at Eryu's challenge ;-) > > Great! Thanks for the update! > FYI, not sure if and when that was mentioned. inode sharing feature is now on overlayfs-next. So are the two file handle fixes for which I posted the test: "overlay: regression test for two file handle bugs" (will re-post when I have the final kernel commits) Thanks, Amir.