From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FA7C2BA83 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74D9222C2 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WexSahva" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389746AbgBNSpZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:45:25 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f195.google.com ([209.85.166.195]:34756 "EHLO mail-il1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389723AbgBNSpZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:45:25 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-f195.google.com with SMTP id l4so8914422ilj.1; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:45:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ujLZ//Mw6vtAjFLcWjyIUHYK6uJak5XPcS0/tv4WkGY=; b=WexSahva98CfswF0q/JWX+SFIgttENQENTSOqxMFmfVdqh6Zc+mz9Yl9GcC40Z4ywq G9WeUKklsFeFVdbvEJ/XpZWLzrU499V+gVQSyywCigzypa78O2yjRX+cPOzf295sGt2D n1CpfBBLUXrteki1icteEtctyoIFYm53ADmye4pC0wD6vXVs2VWemyxq7XN9BMmxHx0s cjgZB4VFF/lFx66L/33idNyDiIwcg19mQcax9f2VEw8O50uUft/68T3lmfzL7i3zwmln rU+gNWRP+wA3i92E7rhRkBUv3DTxaPRcR6szJaMUFuingUfzFpUNMX4+zK8IOimqmyYB 772A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ujLZ//Mw6vtAjFLcWjyIUHYK6uJak5XPcS0/tv4WkGY=; b=PJCrRSCQu9l7Utpyzc4lLpD0qtp4/sGGsrFNvZnYJRPpZ1H+QUmmhIxcZ6tlqMtbSx pAWATua5wS7BPei2K+oZ735CnMFilCCKpqaV/FWlgH3iXCC2PJLrKJj4OC0ru1xxiA4F UIsXFbmdJBuCvO1XRdjOlabA/i4qj65GL5Vxv5488pFtt+lvrR8UWFEKkpf1GreuCD2g hbqgxV2+HXZOiRiaOvSc5S0p/xQQs4uJb28LyrNWAH5q5i80R6iecg9Iuqgd1Hzgz2tp h2JE0p9fCRi5pZTq7Zw79U4UWKmcr8714mGSS0jueZ6ROg4Ywq61ScOyqCi40b7xLUxn 0RaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTZO8t/fhsKd4g8+82QknpBPaTpDRO5zZusa4a/+EuliFk5E+l +BmReypRyzPRbseVy6cHwU0n0rba+/REJRScIKpvWs8h9nE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZOoj7uz+HGZX4MVZbuAVWhm0csKWg0ZAO7KM5cKu3MpIfR0KEBYBMCocltnOsaXxCP21GNbjY99w+/D97RjQ= X-Received: by 2002:a92:5c8a:: with SMTP id d10mr4496735ilg.137.1581705924496; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:45:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200214151848.8328-1-mfo@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <20200214151848.8328-1-mfo@canonical.com> From: Amir Goldstein Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 20:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] fstests: overlay: initial support for aufs and To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira Cc: fstests , overlayfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org +CC: On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 5:18 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote: > > This patchset allows the existing support for overlay to be used with > aufs and fuse-overlayfs, so the increase the coverage/test tools that > are available for these filesystems. > > Initial numbers on v5.4-based Ubuntu kernel on Ubuntu Eoan/19.10 > (fuse-overlay installed from distro package), few tests excluded: > > OVL_FSTYP=aufs > - Ran: 645 tests > - Not run: 483 tests > - Failures: 22 tests > > OVL_FSTYP=fuse.fuse-overlayfs > - Ran: 530 > - Not run: 395 > - Failures: 29 > It'd be interesting to know the baseline - what are those numbers for OVL_FSTYP=overlay with same kernel? Thanks, Amir. > Thanks to Amir Goldstein for review/improvements/suggestions. > > Changes: > - v2: > - fix tests/overlay that hardcode the overlay fs type > - add support to fuse-overlayfs with +3 other patches > - v1: > - [PATCH] common/overlay,rc: introduce OVL_ALT_FSTYP for testing aufs > > Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (5): > common/overlay,rc,config: introduce OVL_FSTYP variable and aufs > tests/overlay: mount: replace overlay hardcode with OVL_FSTYP variable > common/rc: introduce new helper function _fs_type_dev_dir() > common/rc: add quirks for fuse-overlayfs device/mount point > common/overlay: silence some mount messages for fuse-overlayfs > > README.overlay | 5 ++++ > common/config | 2 ++ > common/overlay | 29 +++++++++++++++++++--- > common/rc | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > tests/overlay/011 | 2 +- > tests/overlay/035 | 2 +- > tests/overlay/052 | 4 ++-- > tests/overlay/053 | 4 ++-- > tests/overlay/062 | 2 +- > 9 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 >