From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934D0C4740A for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7519A218DE for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728829AbfIIMpd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:45:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58438 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728733AbfIIMpc (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:45:32 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515C2ACC1; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1568033125.365.17.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: Lacie Rugged USB3-FW does not work with UAS From: Oliver Neukum To: Julian Sikorski , Nathan Stratton Treadway Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:45:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1566567572.8347.54.camel@suse.com> <0eaecb64-4c67-110d-8493-31dd7fd58759@gmail.com> <1566595393.8347.56.camel@suse.com> <5f8f8e05-a29b-d868-b354-75ac48d40133@gmail.com> <1567424535.2469.11.camel@suse.com> <2a06a5dd-3fc9-0aac-a7e2-67be35e2d6bb@gmail.com> <20190904155831.GE4337@nathanst.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, den 04.09.2019, 19:10 +0200 schrieb Julian Sikorski: > > > Moreover, does this matter that the two Read Capacity errors only appear > after the device is disconnected? Hi, yes it does. However, it didn't in the first log I looked at. Could you check whether the command the failure happens on is constant? That is, test a few times and look for differences. Regards Oliver