From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH] usb: mtu3: fix NULL pointer dereference
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:52:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593658371.23885.16.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701115821.GA2184169@kroah.com>
On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 13:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:42:22PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > Some pointers are dereferenced before successful checks.
> >
> > Reported-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > v2: nothing changed, but abandon another patch
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
> > index f93732e..1689ca8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
> > @@ -332,14 +332,21 @@ static int mtu3_gadget_queue(struct usb_ep *ep,
> >
> > static int mtu3_gadget_dequeue(struct usb_ep *ep, struct usb_request *req)
> > {
> > - struct mtu3_ep *mep = to_mtu3_ep(ep);
> > - struct mtu3_request *mreq = to_mtu3_request(req);
> > + struct mtu3_ep *mep;
> > + struct mtu3_request *mreq;
> > struct mtu3_request *r;
> > + struct mtu3 *mtu;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int ret = 0;
> > - struct mtu3 *mtu = mep->mtu;
> >
> > - if (!ep || !req || mreq->mep != mep)
> > + if (!ep || !req)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> How will either of those ever be NULL? The kernel will not call this
> function with either of them being NULL, right?
Yes, I find all class drivers already ensure they are not NULL.
>
> > +
> > + mep = to_mtu3_ep(ep);
> > + mtu = mep->mtu;
> > +
> > + mreq = to_mtu3_request(req);
> > + if (mreq->mep != mep)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > dev_dbg(mtu->dev, "%s : req=%p\n", __func__, req);
> > @@ -373,8 +380,8 @@ static int mtu3_gadget_dequeue(struct usb_ep *ep, struct usb_request *req)
> > */
> > static int mtu3_gadget_ep_set_halt(struct usb_ep *ep, int value)
> > {
> > - struct mtu3_ep *mep = to_mtu3_ep(ep);
> > - struct mtu3 *mtu = mep->mtu;
> > + struct mtu3_ep *mep;
> > + struct mtu3 *mtu;
> > struct mtu3_request *mreq;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int ret = 0;
> > @@ -382,6 +389,9 @@ static int mtu3_gadget_ep_set_halt(struct usb_ep *ep, int value)
> > if (!ep)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Same here, how can that ever happen?
Maybe when the class driver has something wrong:)
You mean it's better to remove these unnecessary checks?
Thanks
>
> >
> > + mep = to_mtu3_ep(ep);
> > + mtu = mep->mtu;
> > +
> > dev_dbg(mtu->dev, "%s : %s...", __func__, ep->name);
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&mtu->lock, flags);
> > @@ -422,11 +432,12 @@ static int mtu3_gadget_ep_set_halt(struct usb_ep *ep, int value)
> > /* Sets the halt feature with the clear requests ignored */
> > static int mtu3_gadget_ep_set_wedge(struct usb_ep *ep)
> > {
> > - struct mtu3_ep *mep = to_mtu3_ep(ep);
> > + struct mtu3_ep *mep;
> >
> > if (!ep)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Again, same here.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 7:42 [V2 PATCH] usb: mtu3: fix NULL pointer dereference Chunfeng Yun
2020-06-30 10:47 ` [PATCH v2] usb: mtu3: Fix NULL pointer dereferences Markus Elfring
2020-07-01 11:58 ` [V2 PATCH] usb: mtu3: fix NULL pointer dereference Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-02 2:52 ` Chunfeng Yun [this message]
2020-07-09 6:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-07-09 6:40 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-07-09 7:05 ` Chunfeng Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1593658371.23885.16.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).