From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: cy_huang <u0084500@gmail.com>, <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <cy_huang@richtek.com>,
<gene_chen@richtek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb typec: tcpci: mt6360: Add vsafe0v support and external vbus supply control
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:33:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1611041612.12761.9.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a4a88a9-f0e3-2b65-9df4-6c1d4e3f1c14@roeck-us.net>
On Sun, 2021-01-17 at 09:43 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 1/15/21 6:13 AM, cy_huang wrote:
> > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> >
> > MT6360 not support for TCPC command to control source and sink.
>
> does not
>
> > Uses external 5V vbus regulator as the vbus source control.
> >
> Use
>
> > Also adds the capability to report vsafe0v.
> >
> add
>
> So far this driver works without regulator. Unless I am missing something,
> this patch makes regulator support mandatory, meaning existing code will fail.
If don't provide vbus-supply in DTS, regulator framework will provide a
dummy regulator, so the code will not fail.
> I am not sure if that is appropriate/acceptable. Can we be sure that this will
> work for existing users of this driver ?
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_mt6360.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_mt6360.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_mt6360.c
> > index f1bd9e0..0edf4b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_mt6360.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_mt6360.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/usb/tcpm.h>
> >
> > #include "tcpci.h"
> > @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct mt6360_tcpc_info {
> > struct tcpci_data tdata;
> > struct tcpci *tcpci;
> > struct device *dev;
> > + struct regulator *vbus;
> > int irq;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -51,6 +53,27 @@ static inline int mt6360_tcpc_write16(struct regmap *regmap,
> > return regmap_raw_write(regmap, reg, &val, sizeof(u16));
> > }
> >
> > +static int mt6360_tcpc_set_vbus(struct tcpci *tcpci, struct tcpci_data *data, bool src, bool snk)
> > +{
> > + struct mt6360_tcpc_info *mti = container_of(data, struct mt6360_tcpc_info, tdata);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* To correctly handle the already enabled vbus and disable its supply first */
> > + if (regulator_is_enabled(mti->vbus)) {
> > + ret = regulator_disable(mti->vbus);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> Is it really a good idea to disable vbus if it happens to be already enabled
> and there is (another ?) request to enable it ?
>
> > +
> > + if (src) {
> > + ret = regulator_enable(mti->vbus);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int mt6360_tcpc_init(struct tcpci *tcpci, struct tcpci_data *tdata)
> > {
> > struct regmap *regmap = tdata->regmap;
> > @@ -138,7 +161,13 @@ static int mt6360_tcpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (mti->irq < 0)
> > return mti->irq;
> >
> > + mti->vbus = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vbus");
> > + if (IS_ERR(mti->vbus))
> > + return PTR_ERR(mti->vbus);
> > +
> > mti->tdata.init = mt6360_tcpc_init;
> > + mti->tdata.set_vbus = mt6360_tcpc_set_vbus;
> > + mti->tdata.vbus_vsafe0v = 1;
> > mti->tcpci = tcpci_register_port(&pdev->dev, &mti->tdata);
> > if (IS_ERR(mti->tcpci)) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register tcpci port\n");
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 14:13 [PATCH 1/2] usb typec: tcpci: mt6360: Add vsafe0v support and external vbus supply control cy_huang
2021-01-15 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb typec: tcpci: mt6360: Add vbus supply into dt-binding description cy_huang
2021-01-17 15:45 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-18 8:33 ` ChiYuan Huang
2021-01-19 23:10 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 1:50 ` ChiYuan Huang
2021-01-17 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb typec: tcpci: mt6360: Add vsafe0v support and external vbus supply control Guenter Roeck
2021-01-18 8:28 ` ChiYuan Huang
2021-01-19 7:37 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-19 8:23 ` ChiYuan Huang
2021-03-29 14:12 ` ChiYuan Huang
2021-01-19 7:33 ` Chunfeng Yun [this message]
2021-01-19 8:21 ` ChiYuan Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1611041612.12761.9.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=cy_huang@richtek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gene_chen@richtek.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=u0084500@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).