linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>,
	Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Create platform device for onboard hubs in probe()
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:14:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161307087919.1254594.11784819060723374369@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCRcIuCxB8nYi7/e@google.com>

Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2021-02-10 14:20:18)
> 
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:06:45PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> > This looks hackish... what if later we have something else than hub?
> > Another if()?
> > 
> > What if hub could be connected to something else than XHCI controller?
> 
> In earlier versions this was standalone driver, which was more flexible and
> didn't require cooperation from the XHCI driver:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1313001/
> 
> Rob Herring raised objections about the DT bindings, since the USB hub would be
> represented twice in the DT, once in the USB hierachry (with an explicit node or
> implicitly) plus a node for the platform device for the new driver:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1305395/
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1313000/
> 
> Alan Stern suggested to create the platform device in the XHCI platform driver:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1313000/#1510227
> 
> I wasn't super happy about involving xhci-plat, but at least the code is minimal
> and all the device specific stuff is handled by the onboard_usb_hub driver.
> 
> If you have better suggestions that might satisfy all parties please let us
> know :)
> 

Is it possible to use the graph binding to connect the USB controller on
the SoC to the port on the hub? Then the hub would be a standalone node
at the root of DT connected to the USB controller (or phy) and xhci code
could probe the firmware to see if there's a graph connection downstream
that is a powered hub like this. I didn't see this idea mentioned in the
previous discussions, but maybe I missed it.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10 17:10 [PATCH v5 0/4] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for discrete onboard USB hubs Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-11 14:56   ` Rob Herring
2021-02-17 21:04   ` Rob Herring
2021-02-18  1:33     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-19 15:05       ` Rob Herring
2021-02-22 17:39         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-11  7:03   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-11 18:04     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Create platform device for onboard hubs in probe() Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-10 21:06   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-02-10 22:20     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-11 19:14       ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2021-02-11 20:36         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-11 20:45           ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-11 22:46             ` Rob Herring
2021-02-11 22:40         ` Rob Herring
2021-02-11  6:58   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-11 18:45     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-11 19:01       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: Add nodes for onboard USB hub Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-10 21:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-02-10 22:37   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-02-24 13:25 ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161307087919.1254594.11784819060723374369@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=ravisadineni@chromium.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).