linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	youling 257 <youling257@gmail.com>
Cc: <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<saravanak@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: core: Add consumer device link support
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:30:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cd5885d-7db4-59b9-ef2d-e3556f60ca68@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd72269-16ae-b24a-7144-44d22d668dc6@ti.com>

Hi Kishon,

On 2/10/20 9:08 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> On 07/02/20 12:27 PM, youling 257 wrote:
>> test this diff, dwc3 work for my device, thanks.
>>
>> 2020-02-07 13:16 GMT+08:00, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 06/02/20 7:09 PM, youling257 wrote:
>>>> This patch cause "dwc3 dwc3.3.auto: failed to create device link to
>>>> dwc3.3.auto.ulpi" problem.
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206435
>>>
>>> I'm suspecting there is some sort of reverse dependency with dwc3 ULPI.
>>> Can you try the following diff?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>> index 2eb28cc2d2dc..397311dcb116 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ struct phy *phy_get(struct device *dev, const char
>>> *string)
>>>
>>>          get_device(&phy->dev);
>>>
>>> -       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
>>> +       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY);
>>>          if (!link) {
>>>                  dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
>>>                          dev_name(phy->dev.parent));
>>> @@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ struct phy *devm_of_phy_get(struct device *dev,
>>> struct device_node *np,
>>>                  return phy;
>>>          }
>>>
>>> -       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
>>> +       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY);
>>>          if (!link) {
>>>                  dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
>>>                          dev_name(phy->dev.parent));
>>> @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ struct phy *devm_of_phy_get_by_index(struct device
>>> *dev, struct device_node *np,
>>>          *ptr = phy;
>>>          devres_add(dev, ptr);
>>>
>>> -       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
>>> +       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY);
>>>          if (!link) {
>>>                  dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
>>>                          dev_name(phy->dev.parent));Parent
> 
> Can you check if this doesn't affect the suspend/resume ordering?

With this fix, suspend/resume ordering is broken on my side. What do you 
think to keep the STATELESS flag and to only display a warn if 
"device_link_add" returns an error ? It's not "smart" but it could 
solved our issue.

As a lot of improvements have been recently done on device link topic by 
Saravana, we could check with him what is the way to follow.

Regards
Alex

> 
> Thanks
> Kishon
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-10 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-04 14:37 [PATCH] phy: core: Add consumer device link support Alexandre Torgue
2019-12-04 15:33 ` Alexandre Torgue
2019-12-04 17:19   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-07 11:51 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-08  7:29   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-01-08  8:37     ` Alexandre Torgue
2020-02-06 13:39 ` youling257
2020-02-07  5:16   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-07  6:57     ` youling 257
2020-02-10  8:08       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-10 11:30         ` Alexandre Torgue [this message]
2020-02-10 12:18           ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-11  6:17             ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-14 18:46           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-17  8:35             ` Alexandre Torgue
2020-02-17  8:40               ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1cd5885d-7db4-59b9-ef2d-e3556f60ca68@st.com \
    --to=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    --cc=youling257@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).