linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] usb: xhci: add firmware loader for uPD720201 and uPD720202 w/o ROM
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:36:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626070658.GP2962@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624061126.11938-2-vkoul@kernel.org>

On 24-06-19, 11:41, Vinod Koul wrote:
> From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
> 
> This patch adds a firmware loader for the uPD720201K8-711-BAC-A
> and uPD720202K8-711-BAA-A variant. Both of these chips are listed
> in Renesas' R19UH0078EJ0500 Rev.5.00 "User's Manual: Hardware" as
> devices which need the firmware loader on page 2 in order to
> work as they "do not support the External ROM".
> 
> The "Firmware Download Sequence" is describe in chapter
> "7.1 FW Download Interface" R19UH0078EJ0500 Rev.5.00 page 131.
> 
> The firmware "K2013080.mem" is available from a USB3.0 Host to
> PCIe Adapter (PP2U-E card) "Firmware download" archive. An
> alternative version can be sourced from Netgear's WNDR4700 GPL
> archives.
> 
> The release notes of the PP2U-E's "Firmware Download" ver 2.0.1.3
> (2012-06-15) state that the firmware is for the following devices:
>  - uPD720201 ES 2.0 sample whose revision ID is 2.
>  - uPD720201 ES 2.1 sample & CS sample & Mass product, ID is 3.
>  - uPD720202 ES 2.0 sample & CS sample & Mass product, ID is 2.
> 
> Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> [vkoul: fixed comments:
> 	used macros for timeout count and delay
> 	removed renesas_fw_alive_check
> 	cleaned renesas_fw_callback
> 	removed recurion for renesas_fw_download
> 	added MODULE_FIRMWARE
> 	removed length check]
> Tested-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 454 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 454 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> index c2fe218e051f..89ca46dd6825 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> +#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
>  
>  #include "xhci.h"
>  #include "xhci-trace.h"
> @@ -55,6 +57,9 @@
>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_PROMONTORYA_1			0x43bc
>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_1042A_XHCI		0x1142
>  
> +#define RENESAS_RETRY	1000
> +#define RENESAS_DELAY	10

So some devices are exhibiting failure on both ROM programming as well
as RAM load with messages:

ROM Download Step 34 failed at position 136 bytes
Firmware Download Step 2 failed at position 8 bytes with (-110)

So I am going to revert to older delay values! With those we dont get a
failures. yeah looks like ROM load takes a while on these

Thanks

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-26  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-24  6:11 [PATCH v3 0/4] usb: xhci: Add support for Renesas USB controllers Vinod Koul
2019-06-24  6:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] usb: xhci: add firmware loader for uPD720201 and uPD720202 w/o ROM Vinod Koul
2019-06-26  7:06   ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2019-06-24  6:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] usb: xhci: Use register defined and field names Vinod Koul
2019-06-24  6:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] usb: xhci: Add ROM loader for uPD720201 Vinod Koul
2019-06-24  6:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] usb: xhci: allow multiple firmware versions Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190626070658.GP2962@vkoul-mobl \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=chunkeey@gmail.com \
    --cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).