From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C50C3A589 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B9A206C1 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AShm35gz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728685AbfHOPUG (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:20:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:38194 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728662AbfHOPUG (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:20:06 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id e11so1430127pga.5 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:20:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ab/77+kQbrAu+raRKeV4nLprWDGh+BMS6F0zkUe7w6U=; b=AShm35gzNjTUaie+TT5wVyFpIGqin3y7DTmj+vOvYFUC6+MS8QVfMh6bbMGfuU9gGb DBLgng/LYxnhhVrous14RmMH9F+2oHiduKgaSWk/K9l/Ap46ePkRT+5dhqfMDiBi/b8H eeZ5G/OWV6UAxThww4qoIgzUohJc0+1d/61vLHFRr1ohC+hCr8QWHb1oEN+yW6wIbBbX KUK3zrfnOOb8hvvA/BKlFqIIUUJ0K6+21DiSajOgH90xML83/mc+MwJ1ezFwigZSVvan 3LBGuGeMP959hDaNG9wz+nZbu9SZO/ca7ejDY67E8eEB1cEB+HFrCa44o3NQwsWvMPmq pDzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ab/77+kQbrAu+raRKeV4nLprWDGh+BMS6F0zkUe7w6U=; b=IThrooCwO1Er2ZWXntvrgl8HIonDUqJzHAACYWIlTrz15jfNr0Y2J7E3dfXlMIus42 fiylP7z8hbAnPCTGFeRKL1D4sA7kaxaBMcb66JFMJo8zv/C3zh8BWidWeOCAoPmTey6g 4xCmPHn35VeVR2S1otFh68cYxZt5TZLWEBTb7R04gtXUIb50fAAP3DMJuzPxf6Frn3dq SDTkoqf+DgfDnk0clMGPIx5uhst919OMAmUhj9cF3fpbx9CW75yTLdTDnuV7MnrMqcUk m8PaUNmu3HP+rJokmnXhkQFRTCTZIsy+aBIx5yqSujYW9BgfBWMqMnOM7MJffH6eC8E7 6pRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUnA62mevGIVwc26K8peJTdCab/jd/wnY5HumXYVwwlwNtiFOSW PHrXBNtVlOuS61XjK11Hjsc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw9wQpybyZAQLjdD/8lRTd62QhpnNzO2LBsmiCImcEVjATt6eAc95e7umlaqyd2htH8ltQKEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2364:: with SMTP id u36mr3721671pgm.449.1565882406052; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm2617859pgm.9.2019.08.15.08.20.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:20:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:20:04 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Heikki Krogerus Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hans de Goede , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: fusb302: Call fusb302_debugfs_init earlier Message-ID: <20190815152004.GD23562@roeck-us.net> References: <20190813101524.80673-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20190813105216.GD4691@kuha.fi.intel.com> <20190815125441.GB24270@kroah.com> <20190815133159.GB24772@kuha.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190815133159.GB24772@kuha.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:31:59PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > > As Guenter points out, don't check this, just call it anb move on. > > > > But are you _SURE_ you want this to be the name, at the root of debugfs? > > Why not put it under the usb debugfs directory? > > That's a good point. Let's move it there while at it. > Maybe we should move the tcpm root as well ? Guenter