linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Improved device recognition on remote wakeup
@ 2020-01-09  5:14 Keiya Nobuta
  2020-01-09 15:22 ` Alan Stern
  2020-01-09 15:46 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keiya Nobuta @ 2020-01-09  5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh; +Cc: linux-usb, Keiya Nobuta

If hub_activate() is called before D+ has stabilized after remote
wakeup, the following situation might occur:

         __      ___________________
        /  \    /
D+   __/    \__/

Hub  _______________________________
          |  ^   ^           ^
          |  |   |           |
Host _____v__|___|___________|______
          |  |   |           |
          |  |   |           \-- Interrupt Transfer (*3)
          |  |    \-- ClearPortFeature (*2)
          |   \-- GetPortStatus (*1)
          \-- Host detects remote wakeup

- D+ goes high, Host starts running by remote wakeup
- D+ is not stable, goes low
- Host requests GetPortStatus at (*1) and gets the following hub status:
  - Current Connect Status bit is 0
  - Connect Status Change bit is 1
- D+ stabilizes, goes high
- Host requests ClearPortFeature and thus Connect Status Change bit is
  cleared at (*2)
- After waiting 100 ms, Host starts the Interrupt Transfer at (*3)
- Since the Connect Status Change bit is 0, Hub returns NAK.

In this case, port_event() is not called in hub_event() and Host cannot
recognize device. To solve this issue, flag change_bits even if only
Connect Status Change bit is 1 when got in the first GetPortStatus.

This issue occurs rarely because it only if D+ changes during a very
short time between GetPortStatus and ClearPortFeature. However, it is
fatal if it occurs in embedded system.

Signed-off-by: Keiya Nobuta <nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index f229ad6..77f8eb1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -1192,6 +1192,7 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub *hub, enum hub_activation_type type)
 			 * PORT_OVER_CURRENT is not. So check for any of them.
 			 */
 			if (udev || (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION) ||
+			    (portchange & USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION) ||
 			    (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_OVERCURRENT) ||
 			    (portchange & USB_PORT_STAT_C_OVERCURRENT))
 				set_bit(port1, hub->change_bits);
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Improved device recognition on remote wakeup
  2020-01-09  5:14 [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Improved device recognition on remote wakeup Keiya Nobuta
@ 2020-01-09 15:22 ` Alan Stern
  2020-01-09 15:46 ` Greg KH
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Stern @ 2020-01-09 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keiya Nobuta; +Cc: gregkh, linux-usb

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Keiya Nobuta wrote:

> If hub_activate() is called before D+ has stabilized after remote
> wakeup, the following situation might occur:
> 
>          __      ___________________
>         /  \    /
> D+   __/    \__/
> 
> Hub  _______________________________
>           |  ^   ^           ^
>           |  |   |           |
> Host _____v__|___|___________|______
>           |  |   |           |
>           |  |   |           \-- Interrupt Transfer (*3)
>           |  |    \-- ClearPortFeature (*2)
>           |   \-- GetPortStatus (*1)
>           \-- Host detects remote wakeup
> 
> - D+ goes high, Host starts running by remote wakeup
> - D+ is not stable, goes low
> - Host requests GetPortStatus at (*1) and gets the following hub status:
>   - Current Connect Status bit is 0
>   - Connect Status Change bit is 1
> - D+ stabilizes, goes high
> - Host requests ClearPortFeature and thus Connect Status Change bit is
>   cleared at (*2)
> - After waiting 100 ms, Host starts the Interrupt Transfer at (*3)
> - Since the Connect Status Change bit is 0, Hub returns NAK.
> 
> In this case, port_event() is not called in hub_event() and Host cannot
> recognize device. To solve this issue, flag change_bits even if only
> Connect Status Change bit is 1 when got in the first GetPortStatus.
> 
> This issue occurs rarely because it only if D+ changes during a very
> short time between GetPortStatus and ClearPortFeature. However, it is
> fatal if it occurs in embedded system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keiya Nobuta <nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index f229ad6..77f8eb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -1192,6 +1192,7 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub *hub, enum hub_activation_type type)
>  			 * PORT_OVER_CURRENT is not. So check for any of them.
>  			 */
>  			if (udev || (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION) ||
> +			    (portchange & USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION) ||
>  			    (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_OVERCURRENT) ||
>  			    (portchange & USB_PORT_STAT_C_OVERCURRENT))
>  				set_bit(port1, hub->change_bits);

I would have added the new test one line lower, so that all the
portstatus checks were adjacent and all the portchange checks were 
adjacent.  But that's a very small thing...

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Improved device recognition on remote wakeup
  2020-01-09  5:14 [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Improved device recognition on remote wakeup Keiya Nobuta
  2020-01-09 15:22 ` Alan Stern
@ 2020-01-09 15:46 ` Greg KH
  2020-01-10  0:48   ` nobuta.keiya
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-01-09 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keiya Nobuta; +Cc: linux-usb

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 02:14:48PM +0900, Keiya Nobuta wrote:
> If hub_activate() is called before D+ has stabilized after remote
> wakeup, the following situation might occur:
> 
>          __      ___________________
>         /  \    /
> D+   __/    \__/
> 
> Hub  _______________________________
>           |  ^   ^           ^
>           |  |   |           |
> Host _____v__|___|___________|______
>           |  |   |           |
>           |  |   |           \-- Interrupt Transfer (*3)
>           |  |    \-- ClearPortFeature (*2)
>           |   \-- GetPortStatus (*1)
>           \-- Host detects remote wakeup
> 
> - D+ goes high, Host starts running by remote wakeup
> - D+ is not stable, goes low
> - Host requests GetPortStatus at (*1) and gets the following hub status:
>   - Current Connect Status bit is 0
>   - Connect Status Change bit is 1
> - D+ stabilizes, goes high
> - Host requests ClearPortFeature and thus Connect Status Change bit is
>   cleared at (*2)
> - After waiting 100 ms, Host starts the Interrupt Transfer at (*3)
> - Since the Connect Status Change bit is 0, Hub returns NAK.
> 
> In this case, port_event() is not called in hub_event() and Host cannot
> recognize device. To solve this issue, flag change_bits even if only
> Connect Status Change bit is 1 when got in the first GetPortStatus.
> 
> This issue occurs rarely because it only if D+ changes during a very
> short time between GetPortStatus and ClearPortFeature. However, it is
> fatal if it occurs in embedded system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keiya Nobuta <nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Is this something that should go into 5.5-final and the stable trees?
Or is it ok for 5.6-rc1?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Improved device recognition on remote wakeup
  2020-01-09 15:46 ` Greg KH
@ 2020-01-10  0:48   ` nobuta.keiya
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nobuta.keiya @ 2020-01-10  0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Greg KH'; +Cc: linux-usb

Hi Greg,

> Is this something that should go into 5.5-final and the stable trees?
> Or is it ok for 5.6-rc1?

It is ok for 5.6-rc1 (I'm glad it goes into both).

thanks,

Keiya Nobuta

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-10  0:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-09  5:14 [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Improved device recognition on remote wakeup Keiya Nobuta
2020-01-09 15:22 ` Alan Stern
2020-01-09 15:46 ` Greg KH
2020-01-10  0:48   ` nobuta.keiya

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).