From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F880C10F29 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7739820757 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="JqeY4afD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726664AbgCQNq1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:46:27 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:40678 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726130AbgCQNq0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:46:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=z9jbMjP794qbDPz7Th4w8ZRttzdlBXsYK76vOF75UR8=; b=JqeY4afDDIKk92QzWL6Lbn69t2 GCoFDnigAmsfYW/YuYECRVOs0mQNtoSgqM6SJJ6h2N7Ge2FGF8TadLsq5hI1qcjMl/c2N0nyBu82t LcydMXmaTttpJZxs6+jhw7oDag8orKZF21yVf61BWyD8MVQ6ldFbLYwNQ6cfRpxFbx04=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jECXp-0006cC-PU; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:46:09 +0100 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:46:09 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Lubomir Rintel Cc: Rob Herring , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Ulf Hansson , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Brown , Daniel Lezcano , Gregory Clement , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs Message-ID: <20200317134609.GN24270@lunn.ch> References: <20200317093922.20785-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200317093922.20785-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> Sender: linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:38:54AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > Hello World, Yah, that is an issue here. Marvell have a few different SoC families, each with there own maintainers. Gregory and I tend to look after 'mvebu', aka orion5x, kirkwood, dove, berlin and a few others. All the others are 'Somebody elses' problem'. How do you think this patchset should get merged? Are we going to split it up, just nominate one maintainer to merge the lot, or go direct to arm-soc? Andrew