From: Jack Pham <jackp@codeaurora.org>
To: Kathiravan T <kathirav@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Balaji Prakash J <bjagadee@codeaurora.org>,
kathirav=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: reference clock configuration
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:14:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210324081457.GB17922@jackp-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e460e5afb0661b5867ee089b3efb0bc5@codeaurora.org>
Hi Kathiravan, Baruch,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:17:49PM +0530, Kathiravan T wrote:
> On 2021-02-15 22:28, Kathiravan T wrote:
> > On 2021-02-10 11:40, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review comments.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 08 2021, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Mon 08 Feb 00:00 CST 2021, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > > > From: Balaji Prakash J <bjagadee@codeaurora.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > DWC_USB3_GFLADJ and DWC_USB3_GUCTL registers contain options
> > > > > to control the behavior of controller with respect to SOF and ITP.
> > > > > The reset values of these registers are aligned for 19.2 MHz
> > > > > reference clock source. This change will add option to override
> > > > > these settings for reference clock other than 19.2 MHz
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested on IPQ6018 SoC based CP01 board with 24MHz reference clock.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Balaji Prakash J <bjagadee@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > [ baruch: mention tested hardware ]
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 5 ++
> > > > > drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 52
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 12 +++++
> > > > > 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
> > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
> > > > > index 1aae2b6160c1..4ffa87b697dc 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
> > > > > @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ Optional properties:
> > > > > - snps,quirk-frame-length-adjustment: Value for
> > > > > GFLADJ_30MHZ field of GFLADJ
> > > > > register for post-silicon frame length adjustment when the
> > > > > fladj_30mhz_sdbnd signal is invalid or incorrect.
> > > > > + - snps,quirk-ref-clock-adjustment: Value for
> > > > > GFLADJ_REFCLK_* fields of GFLADJ
> > > > > + register for reference clock other than 19.2 MHz is used.
> > > >
> > > > What are typical values for this property? What unit does it
> > > > have? How
> > > > does it actually relate to the frequency of the reference clock?
> > >
> > > Downstream codeaurora kernel (fig branch) sets 0xA87F0 for IPQ6018
> > > (24MHz reference clock), and 0x49459 for IPQ5018 (60MHz). So this
> > > value
> > > appears to correlates with clock rate. I have no access to DWC3
> > > documentation. I only tested IPQ6018 hardware.
> > >
> >
> > It will be written as (0xA87F0 << 7) retaining the 0-7 LSB value.
> > I could see, BIT(23) of GFLADJ register enables the functionality of
> > running SOF/ITP counters based on the reference clock. Since this bit
> > is set, we need to
> > compute the other fields as well i.e., from 8th bit to 31st bit.
> > Finally it is derived to
> > 0xA87F0 for IPQ6018.
> >
>
> Bjorn / All,
>
> Any comments on this? Please do suggest if this can be handled in a better
> way.
>
>
> >
> > > > > + - snps,quirk-ref-clock-period: Value for REFCLKPER filed
> > > > > of GUCTL. This field
> > > > > + indicates in terms of nano seconds the period of ref_clk.
> > > > > To calculate the
> > > > > + ideal value, REFCLKPER = (1/ref_clk in Hz)*10^9.
> > > >
> > > > Can't we make the dwc3 reference this clock and use
> > > > clk_get_rate() and
> > > > then do this math in the driver?
> > >
> > > This is doable, I believe. Though current code does not identify
> > > specific clocks, as far as I can see.
I agree it should be doable. Looks like prior to 0d3a97083e0c ("usb:
dwc3: Rework clock initialization to be more flexible") the core did
support specific clocks ("ref", "bus_early", "suspend"), but was
changed to use a simpler devm_clk_bulk_get_all() call.
> > We can mention one more clock(ref) in the USB device node and do the
> > math (NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_get_rate()) in dwc3 driver.
Yea, just need to make sure "ref" clk is specified in the DT node. Then
in the driver you can just iterate through dwc->clks and try to find one
with .id=="ref". If clk_get_rate() succeeds then you can use the value
to calculate the GUCTL.REFCLKPER and GFLADJ register fields.
Or perhaps even use a lookup table, since according to the DWC3
programming guide only 6 refclk frequencies (16, 17, 19.2, 20, 24, 39.7
MHz) are supported so that might be simpler than a few integer divide
operations that would otherwise be required.
Jack
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 6:00 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: reference clock configuration Baruch Siach
2021-02-08 6:56 ` Greg KH
2021-02-08 18:26 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-02-10 6:10 ` Baruch Siach
2021-02-15 16:58 ` Kathiravan T
2021-02-25 16:47 ` Kathiravan T
2021-03-24 8:14 ` Jack Pham [this message]
2021-03-31 0:52 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-03-31 1:17 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-04-07 11:56 ` Kathiravan T
2021-04-08 1:53 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-04-08 2:23 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-04-08 2:50 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-04-08 2:54 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-04-08 3:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-04-08 3:39 ` Thinh Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210324081457.GB17922@jackp-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=jackp@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=bjagadee@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=kathirav=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kathirav@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).