From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] xhci: fix potential array out of bounds with several interrupters
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:02:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210406070208.3406266-4-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210406070208.3406266-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
The Max Interrupters supported by the controller is given in a 10bit
wide bitfield, but the driver uses a fixed 128 size array to index these
interrupters.
Klockwork reports a possible array out of bounds case which in theory
is possible. In practice this hasn't been hit as a common number of Max
Interrupters for new controllers is 8, not even close to 128.
This needs to be fixed anyway
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index f9614716ecd7..ca9385d22f68 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static void xhci_zero_64b_regs(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
int err, i;
u64 val;
+ u32 intrs;
/*
* Some Renesas controllers get into a weird state if they are
@@ -265,7 +266,10 @@ static void xhci_zero_64b_regs(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
if (upper_32_bits(val))
xhci_write_64(xhci, 0, &xhci->op_regs->cmd_ring);
- for (i = 0; i < HCS_MAX_INTRS(xhci->hcs_params1); i++) {
+ intrs = min_t(u32, HCS_MAX_INTRS(xhci->hcs_params1),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(xhci->run_regs->ir_set));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < intrs; i++) {
struct xhci_intr_reg __iomem *ir;
ir = &xhci->run_regs->ir_set[i];
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 7:02 [PATCH 0/4] xhci features for usb-next Mathias Nyman
2021-04-06 7:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] xhci: check port array allocation was successful before dereferencing it Mathias Nyman
2021-04-06 7:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] xhci: check control context is valid " Mathias Nyman
2021-04-06 7:02 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2021-04-06 7:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] xhci: prevent double-fetch of transfer and transfer event TRBs Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210406070208.3406266-4-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).