From: Guido Kiener <Guido.Kiener@rohde-schwarz.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "dpenkler@gmail.com" <dpenkler@gmail.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Guido Kiener <guido@kiener-muenchen.de>,
"Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com" <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"mathias.nyman@intel.com" <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] INFO: rcu detected stall in tx
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 21:25:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35b615b7c7344767b6fd37f7d420787e@rohde-schwarz.com> (raw)
Sorry for the messing "RE: Re: ....". One should be enough.
Next mails I'll send from my private account again, since I can't change the company rules.
This thread continues from my last mail.
Alan, please see below and add other recipient if required.
> > > Otherwise I see only the other approach to change hundred drivers
> > > and add the cases EPROTO, EILSEQ and ETIME in each callback handler.
> > > The usbtmc driver already respects the EILSEQ and ETIME, and only
> > > EPROTO is missing.
> > > The rest should be more a management task.
> > > BTW do you assume it is only a problem for INT pipes or is it also a
> > > problem for isochronous and bulk transfers?
> >
> > All of them. Control too.
> >
> > > > Will you be able to test patches?
> > >
> > > I only can test the USBTMC function in some different PCs. I do not
> > > have automated regression tests for USB drivers or Linux kernels.
> > > Maybe there is company who could do that.
> >
> > Well then, if I do find time to write a patch, I'll ask you to try it
> > out with the usbtmc driver.
>
> You mean that you will do a patch in urb.c or a host driver? Or just add a line in
> usbtmc.c?
> Anyhow there is no hurry. On May 20 I will send you a mail if I'm able to provoke one
> of these hardware errors EPROTO, EILSQ, or ETIME. Otherwise it doesn't make
> sense to test it.
>
> -Guido
I've tested to pull the cable and I can easy produce the -EPROTO (-71) error in the usbtmc.c driver.
The error also happens when I have no traffic and just switch off the USBTMC device (which I can do from home office).
When there is traffic, the IN/OUT pipe will also show some -EPROTO errors from the flying urbs.
On my test PC the amount of error messages vary from 1 to ca. 10 error message issued by the INT pipe (see below).
Nevertheless I do not see the endless loop, since the USB disconnect stops the loop.
(Tested with USB 2.0, older kernel 4.15, but latest modified usbtmc.c driver using ehci-pci)
So I can test fixes (of course with latest kernel) and also setup a machine with USB 3.0.
1. Example
[1616527.017863] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_write_bulk_cb - nonzero write bulk status received: -71
[1616527.032489] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.053998] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.076145] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.098143] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.120244] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.142244] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.164440] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.186517] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.208175] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.230272] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1616527.241982] usb 1-1.4: USB disconnect, device number 3
2. Example
[1622454.299131] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1622454.305815] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_write_bulk_cb - nonzero write bulk status received: -71
[1622454.309921] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -71
[1622454.319121] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1622454.341199] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1622454.363336] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1622454.385466] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1622454.407576] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1622454.422870] usb 1-1.4: USB disconnect, device number 7
3. Example
[1623429.713784] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -71
[1623429.714037] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.714279] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.714528] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.714778] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.715029] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.715278] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.715528] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.715777] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.716028] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.716277] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.718916] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.719168] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.722404] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.725666] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.725918] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: usbtmc_read_bulk_cb - nonzero read bulk status received: -2
[1623429.727837] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1623429.749949] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1623429.772094] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1623429.794184] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1623429.816297] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1623429.838479] usbtmc 1-1.4:1.0: unknown status received: -71
[1623429.838795] usb 1-1.4: USB disconnect, device number 8
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 21:25 Guido Kiener [this message]
2021-05-21 1:24 ` [syzbot] INFO: rcu detected stall in tx Alan Stern
2021-05-21 22:17 ` guido
2021-05-22 2:13 ` Alan Stern
[not found] <000000000000a9b79905c04e25a0@google.com>
2021-04-19 7:27 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-28 6:38 ` Zhang, Qiang
2021-06-28 14:17 ` Alan Stern
2021-06-27 20:20 ` syzbot
2021-09-04 7:55 ` syzbot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-19 16:14 Re: Re: Re: Re: " Guido Kiener
2021-05-19 17:35 ` Alan Stern
2021-05-19 19:38 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-05-20 2:01 ` Alan Stern
2021-05-20 20:30 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-05-24 15:18 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-05-24 18:55 ` Alan Stern
2021-05-24 19:23 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-05-24 22:16 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-05-24 22:48 ` Thinh Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35b615b7c7344767b6fd37f7d420787e@rohde-schwarz.com \
--to=guido.kiener@rohde-schwarz.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=dpenkler@gmail.com \
--cc=guido@kiener-muenchen.de \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).