linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sriharsha Allenki <sallenki@codeaurora.org>
To: "balbi@kernel.org" <balbi@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>,
	Jack Pham <jackp@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Fwd: [DWC3][Gadget] Question regarding the unmapping of request as part of queue failure
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:40:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53a4614f-d1bc-5856-8e01-eb790a6ff7fe@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0105a5cd-936e-fb08-77bf-c2f1dbf0aeed@codeaurora.org>

Hi Felipe,

I was looking at the code flow for ep_queue and came across the
following piece of code.

__dwc3_gadget_kick_transfer {
 
    dwc3_prepare_trbs(dep);
    req = next_request(&dep->started_list);
    if (!req) {
            dep->flags |= DWC3_EP_PENDING_REQUEST;
            return 0;
    }
}

As part of dwc3_prepare_trbs(dep), we get a request from the pending_list
and queue to the tail of the started_list. But here we get the head of
the started_list, now if there is any failure in issuing UPDATE_TRANSFER
to the core, we unmap this request using "dwc3_gadget_del_and_unmap_request".

But if this kick_transfer was part of the ep_queue and we have failed
to issue update transfer, instead of unmapping the request we are trying
to queue, we will be unmapping a different request (first in the started_list)
which the core could have already started processing. I believe we should unmap
the request we are trying to queue but not any other.

Please provide your comments on this.

Thanks,
Sriharsha


       reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26  6:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0105a5cd-936e-fb08-77bf-c2f1dbf0aeed@codeaurora.org>
2020-03-26  6:10 ` Sriharsha Allenki [this message]
2020-03-28  8:34   ` Fwd: [DWC3][Gadget] Question regarding the unmapping of request as part of queue failure Felipe Balbi
2020-04-01 13:26     ` Sriharsha Allenki
2020-04-02  9:53       ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53a4614f-d1bc-5856-8e01-eb790a6ff7fe@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sallenki@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jackp@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgautam@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).