linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	m.v.b@runbox.com, hadess@hadess.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] USB: reset-resume the device when PORT_SUSPEND is set but timeout
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 13:04:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABTNMG24BOS_+uGEYFLJrmEW10eTGjrOowwS7Zb_U+AvkZWTyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510150203.GD863718@rowland.harvard.edu>

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:02 PM Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:50:29PM +0800, chris.chiu@canonical.com wrote:
> > From: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>
> >
> > On the Realtek high-speed Hub(0bda:5487), the port which has wakeup
> > enabled_descendants will sometimes timeout when setting PORT_SUSPEND
> > feature. After checking the PORT_SUSPEND bit in wPortStatus, it is
> > already set. However, the hub will fail to activate because the
> > PORT_SUSPEND feature of that port is not cleared during resume. All
> > connected devices are lost after resume.
> >
> > This commit force reset-resume the device connected to the timeout
> > but suspended port so that the hub will have chance to clear the
> > PORT_SUSPEND feature during resume.
>
> Are you certain that the reset-resume is needed?  What happens if you
> leave out the line that sets udev->reset_resume?  The rest of the patch
> will cause the kernel to realize that the port really is suspended, so
> maybe the suspend feature will get cleared properly during resume.
>
> It's worthwhile to try the experiement and see what happens.
>
> Alan Stern
>

If I leave out the udev->reset_resume set, the resume will fail. Please refer
to the following kernel log. The usb 1-1 is the hub which has wakeup enabled
descendants.

[   57.210472] usb 1-1: kworker/u32:7 timed out on ep0out len=0/0
[   57.211022] usb 1-1-port3: suspend timeout, status 0507
[   57.211130] hub 1-1:1.0: hub_suspend
[   57.230500] usb 1-1: usb suspend, wakeup 0

The timeout happens at 57.210472 and you can see the PORT_SUSPEND
bit is actually set in the "status 0507". The following shows the resume log.

[   58.046556] usb 1-1: usb resume
[   58.114515] usb 1-1: Waited 0ms for CONNECT
[   58.114524] usb 1-1: finish resume
[   58.114928] hub 1-1:1.0: hub_resume
[   58.116035] usb 1-1-port3: status 0507 change 0000
[   58.116720] usb 1-1-port5: status 0503 change 0000
[   58.116778] hub 1-1.3:1.0: hub_resume
[   58.116908] hub 1-1.3:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -71)
[   58.116952] usb 1-1.5: Waited 0ms for CONNECT
[   58.116955] usb 1-1.5: finish resume
[   58.117157] hub 1-1.3:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -71)
[   58.117397] usb 1-1.3-port5: can't resume, status -71
[   58.117782] hub 1-1.3:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -71)
[   58.118147] usb 1-1.3-port2: can't resume, status -71
[   58.118149] usb 1-1.3.2: Waited 0ms for CONNECT
[   58.118151] usb 1-1.3-port2: status 07eb.906e after resume, -19
[   58.118153] usb 1-1.3.2: can't resume, status -19
[   58.118154] usb 1-1.3-port2: logical disconnect
[   58.118526] usb 1-1.3-port2: cannot disable (err = -71)

As you see in the 58.116035, the hub_resume and activate is OK for the
usb 1-1. The "usb 1-1.3: finish resume" is not in the log because it's not
considered suspended and no chance to ClearPortFeature. Then it fails
the subsequent hub 1-1.3 resume and active because the usb 1-1.3 happens
to be a downstream hub. So this is why we need at least udev->reset_resume
to give this kind of timeout port/device a chance to clear port feature and
come back from an unknown state.

Chris

> > Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changelog:
> >   v2:
> >     - create a new variable to keep the result of hub_port_status
> >       when suspend timeout.
> >
> >  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > index b2bc4b7c4289..3c823544e425 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > @@ -3385,6 +3385,21 @@ int usb_port_suspend(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
> >               status = 0;
> >       }
> >       if (status) {
> > +             if (status == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> > +                     u16 portstatus, portchange;
> > +
> > +                     int ret = hub_port_status(hub, port1, &portstatus,
> > +                                     &portchange);
> > +
> > +                     dev_dbg(&port_dev->dev,
> > +                             "suspend timeout, status %04x\n", portstatus);
> > +
> > +                     if (ret == 0 && port_is_suspended(hub, portstatus)) {
> > +                             udev->reset_resume = 1;
> > +                             goto err_wakeup;
> > +                     }
> > +             }
> > +
> >               dev_dbg(&port_dev->dev, "can't suspend, status %d\n", status);
> >
> >               /* Try to enable USB3 LTM again */
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10 14:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] USB: propose a generic fix for PORT_SUSPEND set feature timeout chris.chiu
2021-05-10 14:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] USB: reset-resume the device when PORT_SUSPEND is set but timeout chris.chiu
2021-05-10 15:02   ` Alan Stern
2021-05-11  5:04     ` Chris Chiu [this message]
2021-05-11 16:30       ` Alan Stern
2021-05-12  4:17         ` Chris Chiu
2021-05-12 15:04           ` Alan Stern
2021-05-13  4:21             ` Chris Chiu
2021-05-13 14:41               ` Alan Stern
2021-05-10 14:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "USB: Add reset-resume quirk for WD19's Realtek Hub" chris.chiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABTNMG24BOS_+uGEYFLJrmEW10eTGjrOowwS7Zb_U+AvkZWTyQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=chris.chiu@canonical.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.v.b@runbox.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).