From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28DCC433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA2461606 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233466AbhBWQw1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:52:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42524 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231915AbhBWQw0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:52:26 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1D3F64E61; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:51:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1614099105; bh=eMrPfZ45f1kslps9cQ6Pq/QDF0YNzTrMUdC1uyr4tw8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=J7EjFxOCV/leUi57VQwGwr54yFXYE+0gfeqzucZDHiMTYt3rJptJ2s9o21yPw7MAd zpE0LxE58ZsR2dhta9c2tj9Rt0+jqI0s5ogTfZbVB8H3igF07w55gpo6W0OPJVmona aoQk/cPvGdzJNSv/4kYBItJUZEtI/OTTaiUfGm4LWsZlc/n211zemSz2dpFBZTe4aG lC04WJHISMOiLHsbaNeA6GIplnUn1ZIg/l8qUHuxWNUweHii1dltXwy5Ozn54yVKL4 NIqZwo30jB8PxsSvEFJ8HjHn22jW/O75ZRQ0cHnsePLBsTNkTgnp/FWpyobrPkweFG xSqd3QZMgvUQg== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1lEaun-0006iZ-0s; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:52:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:52:01 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: "Michael G. Katzmann" Cc: charles-yeh@prolific.com.tw, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Charles Yeh , Joe Abbott Subject: Re: non-standard baud rates with Prolific 2303 USB-serial Message-ID: References: <0f9caf26-af58-13a9-9947-47bb646f505e@IEEE.org> <780b9aa6-890d-47fd-d6b2-cd9a39f7634a@IEEE.org> <93584ae4-665e-1e67-01e0-cc53f987bee4@IEEE.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93584ae4-665e-1e67-01e0-cc53f987bee4@IEEE.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:30:41AM -0500, Michael G. Katzmann wrote: > On 2/23/21 11:14 AM, Johan Hovold wrote: > > I only have an HXD (and a GC) here. > > > > The HXD has bcdUSB as 1.10 unlike your TA with 2.00, but not sure that > > helps. > > Sound promising .. why do you think this is this not reliable? Perhaps it is. Perhaps even bcdDevice of 3.00 is enough (includes some older variants that the TA replaced supposedly). Not sure anyone ever tried the current scheme on those older models. Charles, could you post the output of "lsusb -v" for your PL2303TA? And did you verify that you actually got 110 Bd with the current Linux driver? Johan