From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
tuba@ece.ufl.edu, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
oneukum@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: hso: do not call unregister if not registered
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:52:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRoLSvowhZsyKbOk@eldamar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201004071433.GA212114@kroah.com>
Hi Greg, Tuba,
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 09:14:33AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 05:00:42PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:43:23 +0200
> >
> > > @@ -2366,7 +2366,8 @@ static void hso_free_net_device(struct hso_device *hso_dev, bool bailout)
> > >
> > > remove_net_device(hso_net->parent);
> > >
> > > - if (hso_net->net)
> > > + if (hso_net->net &&
> > > + hso_net->net->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
> > > unregister_netdev(hso_net->net);
> > >
> > > /* start freeing */
> >
> > I really want to get out of the habit of drivers testing the internal
> > netdev registration state to make decisions.
> >
> > Instead, please track this internally. You know if you registered the
> > device or not, therefore use that to control whether you try to
> > unregister it or not.
>
> Fair enough. Tuba, do you want to fix this up in this way, or do you
> recommend that someone else do it?
Do I miss something, or did that possibly fall through the cracks?
I was checking some open issues on a downstream distro side and found
htat this thread did not got a follow-up.
Regards,
Salvatore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-16 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-02 11:43 [PATCH v2] net: hso: do not call unregister if not registered Greg KH
2020-10-04 0:00 ` David Miller
2020-10-04 7:14 ` Greg KH
2021-08-16 6:52 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso [this message]
2021-08-16 7:02 ` Greg KH
2021-08-17 15:19 ` Yavuz, Tuba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRoLSvowhZsyKbOk@eldamar.lan \
--to=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=tuba@ece.ufl.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).