From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MALFORMED_FREEMAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D0DC433DF for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8407208B8 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="YHfb/KDk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730277AbgJLSZe (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:25:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726636AbgJLSZd (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:25:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A892FC0613D0; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id dg9so15691925edb.12; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=C095eq86xjn+En5nSlIhEWjGDGnZyziFePy+eLxNRX0=; b=YHfb/KDkG7fr/WaSrCI7gR8BoesWZvhwrk0wirlJKz1GfAWuqqYiWVqGMJijLQisMm j0+TsetsVCQrIcyZhBj8+Sm17m6UsLk1Q/2dlK2xDxmmVfark8d+/N6WWQI/pnkj4QWl S3RnBhhg8xFSZ3tV2opELJH5j72/wleecNb+SvRBODmTdP+r/+LJ15XjLILITSUDaeqN D9R9U4eOgcZOdtm4IiwTIj21IAawxU2hGmJLXliwMKTjg0D9Tdvarjsv6LUFf3flLb2T hMOM7pi9xcGe/wcxX3CiPTs1NsIUKJppqMyhbRVTiHYdas6GrdoV66kP7uqMoB1WJ21z bZBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=C095eq86xjn+En5nSlIhEWjGDGnZyziFePy+eLxNRX0=; b=SlNVPsqfofjDHkk/W7v4KZi1qKGuS2JYIjmEgmnpq9JCAf19EKiJPyDWvzzm/05ngS yckZlNo7fNyuWo0cVw40hbAZ9DVeZJvajShyQkw/vmViAbz+G2yyN0L9NAe0+qIr08Os HjVSjfwVIP1iCXU4FPs8u7MzhqfTnTLDB6mFOWJpDFu2qcrK1XRAwZ6K7eFmw58DftVZ NFT1cFSIsvgNttZ2VF3LCIuzY8jMH8GVs9PazhBS7P6LHm4KNKpay/JEm/GZ9PfkmbIC Txa+KeBY7xNXwYhmdOEbJDULh1OdjKUK6kV7CauoIJnaWEZAAcdL+LRmLYesd7AIZ9E4 q4hA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yDkU+SuQwHtzWJM8mjOGBp5aMuBv67m8sgTDfYqFcyt+ov+rF IdaJe1Si13cCFYEVaiQf6Nj0q/pphWCAbNTK X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFqFNaPMi7ewWw/67vTlF9aiYtWM+DMAaau6bFaLOtPzmPfSQaZFEzvp+6Eajxgh+caTeITw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da12:: with SMTP id r18mr15264051eds.169.1602527132374; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from felia ([2001:16b8:2d57:fc00:a1bd:911e:26f6:597]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm1260804eds.93.2020.10.12.11.25.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:25:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Lukas Bulwahn X-Google-Original-From: Lukas Bulwahn Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:25:30 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: lukas@felia To: Greg Kroah-Hartman cc: Lukas Bulwahn , Alan Stern , Sudip Mukherjee , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-sched: add comment about find_tt() not returning error In-Reply-To: <20201012151816.GA1559916@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <20201011205008.24369-1-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20201012145710.GA631710@rowland.harvard.edu> <20201012151816.GA1559916@kroah.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > And for the static analysis finding, we need to find a way to ignore this > > finding without simply ignoring all findings or new findings that just > > look very similar to the original finding, but which are valid. > > Then I suggest you fix the tool that "flagged" this, surely this is not > the only thing it detected with a test like this, right? > > What tool reported this? > Sudip and I are following on clang analyzer findings. On linux-next, there is new build target 'make clang-analyzer' that outputs a bunch of warnings, just as you would expect from such static analysis tools. We will fix the tool if we can. Lukas