From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5101C433DF for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB582080A for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390669AbgJLQtU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:49:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39120 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388766AbgJLQtU (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:49:20 -0400 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 209411] When retrieving string descriptor from mobile device returns eproto error Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:49:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo drivers_usb@kernel-bugs.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: USB X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rachithas104@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_usb@kernel-bugs.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209411 --- Comment #37 from rachithas104@gmail.com --- (In reply to Alan Stern from comment #35) > Come to think of it, that particular change probably _won't_ affect your > Get-String-Descriptor call. It only affects bulk and interrupt endpoints, > not control or isochronous endpoints, and Get-String-Descriptor uses > endpoint 0 (which is a control endpoint). > > Not calling Set-Config seems like the best workaround. Is there any reason > why your program calls it in the first place? Isn't the device already > using the configuration you want? I also see when Set-Config is called from Windows device there is no issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.