From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31853C4338F for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0363960EE2 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238312AbhHNL7p (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2021 07:59:45 -0400 Received: from mxout02.lancloud.ru ([45.84.86.82]:33264 "EHLO mxout02.lancloud.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238064AbhHNL7p (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2021 07:59:45 -0400 Received: from LanCloud DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mxout02.lancloud.ru A8FBA205BB47 Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Stop calling request_irq(), etc. with invalid IRQs in the USB drivers` To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , Felipe Balbi References: From: Sergey Shtylyov Organization: Open Mobile Platform Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:59:09 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.11.198] X-ClientProxiedBy: LFEXT01.lancloud.ru (fd00:f066::141) To LFEX1907.lancloud.ru (fd00:f066::207) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On 14.08.2021 9:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> Here are 2 patches against the 'usb-linus' branch of GregKH's 'usb.git' repo. > > Wait, why that branch? What branch I'd use for the fixes then? > Please make them against the branch you want > them applied to. Hopefully they will apply to the usb-next branch... I didn't intend them for usb-next but looks like they apply there too. MBR, Sergey