From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CFBC31E40 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA8B214C6 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=crapouillou.net header.i=@crapouillou.net header.b="BZmP9L6C" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2407374AbfHIRe5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:34:57 -0400 Received: from outils.crapouillou.net ([89.234.176.41]:56652 "EHLO crapouillou.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406944AbfHIRe5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:34:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crapouillou.net; s=mail; t=1565372095; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JBBXcOCe5jxgeJA9Ew7OF0NMI+cWO0Hl3MGAZrkCgPE=; b=BZmP9L6CMotO++meyoddPkVGWBcxQvNxh7gYS8Y4UEGk/XMSFRg1D3XzJA7G9831ktt00I wAUCLZGOI99DgSnvQn73n5HHPMZPD8WiVKqv45cVvnCznBkyTwtI1KT+LezaLOkLPR4xky BWDQ8VRCq5ko66QP14LTVAAJSeJznxQ= Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 19:34:49 +0200 From: Paul Cercueil Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: jz4740: Driver update To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , od@zcrc.me, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <1565372089.2091.4@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: <20190809172906.GA21450@roeck-us.net> References: <20190809115930.6050-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20190809165207.GA18104@roeck-us.net> <1565369726.2091.0@crapouillou.net> <20190809172906.GA21450@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Le ven. 9 ao=FBt 2019 =E0 19:29, Guenter Roeck a=20 =E9crit : > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: >> Hi Guenter, >>=20 >>=20 >> Le ven. 9 ao=FBt 2019 =E0 18:52, Guenter Roeck a=20 >> =E9crit : >> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in=20 >> smaller >> >> pieces for easier integration to mainline. >> >> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837) >> >> >> >> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The >> >>exception >> >> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This=20 >> function was >> >> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree. >> >> >> >> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4=20 >> branch >> >>of >> >> the MIPS tree >> >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git). >> >> >> > >> >What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream >> >through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ? >>=20 >> You can get it through the watchdog tree if you merge the=20 >> ingenic-tcu-v5.4 >> branch from the MIPS tree. If you'd rather not do that, I can get=20 >> it merged >> through the MIPS tree. >>=20 > I would prefer a merge through the mips tree. >=20 > Guenter Ok; Can I get some signatures then? ;) Thanks, -Paul =