From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:39155 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727182AbeLEJgJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 04:36:09 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id t27so18888997wra.6 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 01:36:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:36:04 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Pascal PAILLET-LME Cc: "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "wim@linux-watchdog.org" , "linux@roeck-us.net" , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" , "benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" , "eballetbo@gmail.com" , "axel.lin@ingics.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Introduce STPMIC1 PMIC Driver Message-ID: <20181205093604.GZ26661@dell> References: <1543571742-17995-1-git-send-email-p.paillet@st.com> <20181203071145.GA26661@dell> <5C069C47.6080305@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5C069C47.6080305@st.com> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 04 Dec 2018, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote: > Le 12/03/2018 08:11 AM, Lee Jones a écrit : > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote: > > > >> The goal of this patch-set is to propose a driver for the STPMIC1 PMIC from > >> STMicroelectronics. > >> The STPMIC1 regulators supply power to an application processor as well as > >> to external system peripherals such as DDR, Flash memories and system > >> devices. It also features onkey button input and an hardware watchdog. > >> The STPMIC1 is controlled via I2C. > >> > >> Main driver is drivers/mfd/stpmic1 that handle I2C regmap configuration and > >> irqchip. stpmic1_regulator, stpmic1_onkey and stpmic1_wdt need stpmic1 mfd > >> as parent. > >> > >> STPMIC1 MFD and regulator drivers maybe mandatory at boot time. > >> > >> Pascal Paillet (7): > >> changes in v7: > >> * rebase on regul/for-next > >> > >> dt-bindings: mfd: document stpmic1 > >> mfd: stpmic1: add stpmic1 driver > >> dt-bindings: input: document stpmic1 pmic onkey > >> input: stpmic1: add stpmic1 onkey driver > >> dt-bindings: watchdog: document stpmic1 pmic watchdog > >> watchdog: stpmic1: add stpmic1 watchdog driver > >> regulator: stpmic1: fix regulator_lock usage > >> > >> .../devicetree/bindings/input/st,stpmic1-onkey.txt | 28 +++ > >> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.txt | 61 ++++++ > >> .../bindings/watchdog/st,stpmic1-wdt.txt | 11 ++ > >> drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 11 ++ > >> drivers/input/misc/Makefile | 2 + > >> drivers/input/misc/stpmic1_onkey.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 16 ++ > >> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/mfd/stpmic1.c | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++ > >> drivers/regulator/stpmic1_regulator.c | 2 +- > > Is it just Mark you're waiting on now? > It is ok now, Mark has applied the patch. > Evrey thing has been acked now. What is the nex step ? Mark has applied patch 7? Why don't I see that? Should you have removed it from this set? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog