On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 03:03:15PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le jeu. 13 déc. 2018 à 10:24, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > >  The PWM in the JZ4725B works the same as in the JZ4740, except that
> > > it
> > >  only has 6 channels available instead of 8.
> > 
> > this driver is probed only from device tree? If yes, it might be
> > sensible to specify the number of PWMs there and get it from there.
> > There doesn't seem to be a generic binding for that, but there are
> > several drivers that could benefit from it. (This is a bigger project
> > though and shouldn't stop your patch. Still more as it already got
> > Thierry's ack.)
> 
> I think there needs to be a proper guideline, as there doesn't seem to be
> a consensus about this. I learned from emails with Rob and Linus (Walleij)
> that I should not have in devicetree what I can deduce from the compatible
> string.

Correct. If the compatible string already defines the number of PWMs
that the hardware exposes, there's no need to explicitly say so again in
DT.

Thierry