On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:18:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 10-11-20, 16:51, Frank Lee wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 07:00, Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It seems that sending too many e-mails at one time will cause some
> > > > emails to fail to be sent out. I will try again.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Instead please reduce the address list to relevant people, as pointed
> > > out by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. Don't Cc irrelevant developers
> > > unless a file is abandoned and you need to get as much audience as
> > > possible... but sunxi is not abandoned.
> > 
> > Thank you for the reminder. I resend the version in the afternoon,
> > only CC the relevant people. I'm not sure. Should the cover be copied
> > to everyone?
> 
> Any reason why this should be a single series.. why not split it to
> bunch of chunks, one per subsystem like pinctrl, phy, dmaengine, etc...
> And then DTS parts and CC relevant list and maintainers. I do not think
> there is any dependency, right?

Yeah, I agree.

One series should be about one topic, so you should have at least:
  - One for the pinctrl fixes
  - One for the DMA controller and related DT patches
  - One for the MMC controller and related DT patches
  - One for the USB controllers and related DT patches
    * And for the PHY, the enable_pmu_unk1 and devm_* patches should be
      sent independently as well
  - One for the watchdog
  - And the PMU patch should be sent independently too

Maxime