linux-watchdog.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Respect handle_boot_enabled when setting last last_hw_keepalive
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:49:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <211cd54b-29b4-e58a-341b-beffc05cfe85@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe8cf65f-f949-9326-8f32-fda7134c8da6@siemens.com>

On 7/30/21 12:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> 
> We must not pet a running watchdog when handle_boot_enabled is off
> because this requests to only start doing that via userspace, not during
> probing.
> 

The scope of the changed function is quite limited. See the
definition of watchdog_set_last_hw_keepalive(). On top of that,
__watchdog_ping() does a bit more than just ping the watchdog,
and it only pings the watchdog in limited circumstances. On top of that,
the scope of handle_boot_enabled is different: If enabled, it tells
the watchdog core to keep pinging a watchdog until userspace opens
the device. This is about continuous pings, not about an initial one.
Given that, I'd rather have the watchdog subsystem issue an additional
ping than risking a regression.

The only driver calling watchdog_set_last_hw_keepalive() is rti_wdt.c.
Does this patch solve a specific problem observed with that watchdog ?

Guenter

> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
>   drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> index 3bab32485273..3c93d00bb284 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> @@ -1172,7 +1172,10 @@ int watchdog_set_last_hw_keepalive(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>   
>   	wd_data->last_hw_keepalive = ktime_sub(now, ms_to_ktime(last_ping_ms));
>   
> -	return __watchdog_ping(wdd);
> +	if (handle_boot_enabled)
> +		return __watchdog_ping(wdd);
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(watchdog_set_last_hw_keepalive);
>   
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-30 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30 19:39 [PATCH] watchdog: Respect handle_boot_enabled when setting last last_hw_keepalive Jan Kiszka
2021-07-30 20:49 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-07-30 21:37   ` Jan Kiszka
2021-07-30 22:39     ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=211cd54b-29b4-e58a-341b-beffc05cfe85@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).