From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC25C2D0E5 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9A42082D for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=walle.cc header.i=@walle.cc header.b="NH9IOM80" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727771AbgC0P2Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:28:16 -0400 Received: from ssl.serverraum.org ([176.9.125.105]:60325 "EHLO ssl.serverraum.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726770AbgC0P2P (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:28:15 -0400 Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (web.serverraum.org [172.16.0.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.serverraum.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB34922FEC; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:28:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walle.cc; s=mail2016061301; t=1585322892; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eqUqITWsj9KDFGHrWeFv9QwKV40MUcbbCm0POjhjwys=; b=NH9IOM80ezOu/xwgBZKQz57gkLeRbVpBO6uhULy0WRIQwRM6uLeXsXUIgRsya4g0GiBhLJ V7nQFEI7obV92eVs8K0Ug7pHGzqpMHjtBP9MH2YUCHq5FqwNCeHAAxhU3Opxy1oqePUh8G x9v49TPkEiJCurb1daDWtLGhW/jpfno= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:28:11 +0100 From: Michael Walle To: Linus Walleij Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio , linux-devicetree , LKML , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, LINUXWATCHDOG , arm-soc , Rob Herring , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Lee Jones , Thierry Reding , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Wim Van Sebroeck , Shawn Guo , Li Yang , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller In-Reply-To: References: <20200317205017.28280-1-michael@walle.cc> <20200317205017.28280-13-michael@walle.cc> <9c310f2a11913d4d089ef1b07671be00@walle.cc> <22944c9b62aa69da418de7766b7741bd@walle.cc> Message-ID: <4d8d3bc26bdf73eb5c0e5851589fe085@walle.cc> X-Sender: michael@walle.cc User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.10 X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Rspamd-Server: web X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EB34922FEC X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.40 / 15.00]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[dt]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[21]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-0.548]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[baylibre.com,vger.kernel.org,lists.infradead.org,kernel.org,suse.com,roeck-us.net,linaro.org,gmail.com,pengutronix.de,linux-watchdog.org,nxp.com,linutronix.de,lakedaemon.net]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Am 2020-03-27 11:20, schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:06 PM Michael Walle wrote: >> Am 2020-03-25 12:50, schrieb Bartosz Golaszewski: > >> > In that case maybe you should use the disable_locking option in >> > regmap_config and provide your own callbacks that you can use in the >> > irqchip code too? >> >> But how would that solve problem (1). And keep in mind, that the >> reqmap_irqchip is actually used for the interrupt controller, which >> is not this gpio controller. >> >> Ie. the interrupt controller of the sl28cpld uses the regmap_irqchip >> and all interrupt phandles pointing to the interrupt controller will >> reference the toplevel node. Any phandles pointing to the gpio >> controller will reference the GPIO subnode. > > Ideally we would create something generic that has been on my > mind for some time, like a generic GPIO regmap irqchip now that > there are a few controllers like that. > > I don't know how feasible it is or how much work it would be. But > as with GPIO_GENERIC (for MMIO) it would be helpful since we > can then implement things like .set_multiple() and .get_multiple() > for everyone. For starters, would that be a drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c or a drivers/base/regmap/regmap-gpio.c? I would assume the first, because the stuff in drivers/base/regmap operates on a given regmap and we'd just be using one, correct? On the other hand there is also the reqmap-irq.c. But as pointed out before, it will add an interrupt controller to the regmap, not a device so to speak. -michael