From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B86C6FA8C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 11:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237301AbiIELNw (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 07:13:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44460 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236467AbiIELNr (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 07:13:47 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 821C05A832; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 04:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id d1so6244264qvs.0; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 04:13:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=7iAktJHc3w6rPsnzClYi6h63eWPfDzaVzHqTBIckRp4=; b=R7t2Qcp1lBflY1vcWSAvFGDpL1wm70fCepnWH+zrAbiof4E0R0r6MaodmK99KC/uqU lkRNi47VWEdS1Mh0Cq7rMIeuWmncJJ2cOty+OFE/rSCBYVUer1tDhNIt1xJajNoN+pha 9hYFjgcUDhUv9vg4Rsjx4Td0f/j+c8XAElCdXPkz1XbyGCnZFSRjvecB8Dt/V/2ytwns pr0+QJCk5ml5PiGLXoq+OBMZT8nSbzyKkmBD4jlfWYYC6/a2AVD44sThrAdLIlOLbLDI BjJuCJ4ppbMAAjAsrBVEK+NW8M6uu3+DQvsU1sl/6kNwDh7BxhDa793GpPoaKD+rDvK/ /Y2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=7iAktJHc3w6rPsnzClYi6h63eWPfDzaVzHqTBIckRp4=; b=0NK01ckdL5j08V3YQTtYIo+1OBWkYlmtcmdswdYO+H7A5QSouGw0BokAEpXPvOHI/j 9UR9Hu15qKJstZLHr0/Nw4/hSgsRwZLzaXeE/zi76ph9hAAna5w9VWLslzkw5gmqkeQJ bM2Z+MPrDcDeUPQ0HefwQ0EZ1t1zsyJ8gnOtqEmgTpOa125/bf/JQiYwYY8vM/rIXY3T SxTZhKLCs6m+pVM81zZfnzruyNJUogTqaYa21kzWlVxBiTwev3n9PVT+373wABUO4k44 kgVjMuMHVKqk2d6IdogMm2gjevbFOZ+ZIH0/u4N9ZJL+dHrlC//y7g3S1eUQ8ljKZiQI MJDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0u/g86km4ZaPLA5q6xuhhjOs7ZlRawnPW+dndLmH6gbLVU8ddI OJHwG50ko/PlU8FAOLy7Sn7XcrZnsTAEe2jQtMY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7NrRmeK1sjqt1ZjgVXwez7kxeuRCTCLwTPPcAUxaHLOiRLXkVvjX6xUtf8npwaMKmSjSHhnRIt4pJmIe7SA1s= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:19cf:b0:4a9:4241:2399 with SMTP id j15-20020a05621419cf00b004a942412399mr1093930qvc.64.1662376424240; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 04:13:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220903-gpiod_get_from_of_node-remove-v1-0-b29adfb27a6c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20220903-gpiod_get_from_of_node-remove-v1-0-b29adfb27a6c@gmail.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 14:13:08 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] Get rid of [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node() public APIs To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Thierry Reding , Mark Brown , Matti Vaittinen , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Claudiu Beznea , Liam Girdwood , Wim Van Sebroeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Guenter Roeck , Miquel Raynal , Linus Walleij , Felipe Balbi , Alexandre Belloni , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Vignesh Raghavendra , Daniel Vetter , Thomas Petazzoni , Alexandre Torgue , Marc Zyngier , Richard Weinberger , David Airlie , Nicolas Ferre , Alyssa Rosenzweig , Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Hunter , Rob Herring , Maxime Coquelin , Bjorn Helgaas , =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= , LINUXWATCHDOG , USB , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , linux-pci , linux-tegra , "open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > I would like to stop exporting OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node() > so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit. We can do that by switching drivers > to use generic fwnode API ([devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get()). By doing so we open > the door to augmenting device tree and ACPI information through secondary > software properties (once we teach gpiolib how to handle those). > > I hope that relevant maintainers will take patches through their trees and > then we could merge the last one some time after -rc1. I'm in favour of the series, but some comments would be good to be addressed. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko