From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F568C433E0 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D28205CA for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728081AbhAZWpH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:45:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43926 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405684AbhAZUyF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:54:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9475DC0613D6; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:53:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id l18so2978569pji.3; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:53:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rbiGPK10hMkVPDroKMLJ5oV5M7XFgnNXGS2BK8hWuOo=; b=rn/iGPtlK1tCt3ZcyGP0CCdw67MmANd7aV9K8V8aeKMW0OCHolf5rM2iIe3r4DjsNZ F2fnJ6AdLLZDovpjn78dQoAwggG434OjHr5DX8MOMH7+Vl/IPf5JiUKCtosaapLQlE5Y woQ/JsbLBBtAD/Q5HH6Xv3+NbWnByvdyZYrTsvi3vOD9YvZpTS7ffThCt9h0I79+HV+r b/uEZSTH2DnvGIsEOObtjToqzcJZUUYNqmjR4Yt0w2cR9OdaBdi4O9fNBq7dohr/2tLW zM6jUprpc/hFKn6hHnZiyRKWcD6SprVWgRYGxGKRTAmGJxOlkCdfcAsr1j89x+5wiViQ Khcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rbiGPK10hMkVPDroKMLJ5oV5M7XFgnNXGS2BK8hWuOo=; b=i6tyKPLyzcFEQCADGpTP9onWXOFToxJdTnaqtSz9UgDACTI/uSGuOgihOY3/uvlaCq C6WY9TrSwzFPPPTKq2et4Cwn10qsN8v6JySdq/7+7D/GcpL/t1qMIxUmzDNYXXBQaJAD BLvi6x7bGtwrvLdbHkCbDU98XV3ucxlf/KeIPNuaY1zWO9QPjOPxdllLZHNIS7eqlC+y zXhZ9Csn97v6cUC8XBfBdgnzm5aXxuxxZ8fJlpNLbZsNg13S2ErYN2zwngnHMYFfuh50 Yvudm/L78JCSkXmHaUJRebJGWjoaUL6DAAI5ztXkAYOcfbNwAxWKG8ExxSWnfOO9kFd2 iZpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WckD9vDEuUTFdCPObqFgRL9IA8vNrWmdLy6u0ws8DJGvJQZyA m+LBVMdmypfB+W4WvYOiUK3aUmlmwxSk///yLDc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJydNn/+NYM8T4H1FZKTUZv+sFSaTn9sxHcmr1VIRqWPJz3yxipJEpIX89bzwIqva5/GylV4FLSr9ScI9Y40k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ca98:: with SMTP id y24mr1713563pjt.181.1611694405124; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:53:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3b4c2f63-14e6-5041-3c15-c2d65b229269@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3b4c2f63-14e6-5041-3c15-c2d65b229269@redhat.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:54:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ib-drm-gpio-pdx86-rtc-wdt-v5.12-1 To: Hans de Goede Cc: Patrik Jakobsson , Andy Shevchenko , Platform Driver , Mark Gross , dri-devel , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:33 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > On 1/26/21 6:14 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:55 PM Patrik Jakobsson > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:51 PM Andy Shevchenko > >> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 5:25 PM Patrik Jakobsson > >>> wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>> > >>>>> This is first part of Intel MID outdated platforms removal. It's collected into > >>>>> immutable branch with a given tag, please pull to yours subsystems. > >>>> > >>>> Hi Andy, > >>>> Do you plan on eventually removing X86_INTEL_MID completely? If so, > >>>> then I should probably start looking at removing the corresponding > >>>> parts in GMA500. > >>> > >>> Nope. It is related to only Medfield / Clovertrail platforms. > >>> > >>> There are other (MID) platforms that may / might utilize this driver > >>> in the future. > >> > >> Right, there's still Oaktrail / Moorestown with hardware in the wild. > > > > Actually Moorestown had to be removed a few years ago (kernel won't > > boot on them anyway from that date when Alan removed support under > > arch/x86 for it). > > > > I'm talking about Merrifield and Moorefield that can utilize it and > > also some other platforms that are not SFI based (Cedar something... > > IIRC). > > Yes at least there are some 64 bit capable SoCs with GMA500 which were > used in NAS like devices. These NAS-es actually have a VGA output > (and maybe also DVI?) which is attached to the GMA500. Since you are talking about 64-bit, definitely they are *not* Moorestown, Medfield, Clovertrail since the mentioned never were 64-bit. But it would be nice to see the CPU model number to be sure. > I know people are running Fedora on these, so we should at least keep > these supported. Is it possible to gather the CPU model number from them? (Or at least the exact device/box name) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko