From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C94C433E9 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97FE64E93 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234057AbhBCLJE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 06:09:04 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:11003 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233258AbhBCLJD (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 06:09:03 -0500 IronPort-SDR: AY9yi9FagsWAuqgJrTNTvNKqUTEPKTVhGYq/eXQ0ZVQq0HmnHoqXeYrOlXvlvT/qynVrGL1Ofx im7v50m9I25g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9883"; a="265856388" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,398,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="265856388" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2021 03:08:19 -0800 IronPort-SDR: o134eirMFPeTUWOydEEw8aYttN75QcofTnGYMkGLqCpwZuyydYfYGmESVeFcTSWS2xu+NjzHnO eEoISbHn+T7w== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,398,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="433366277" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2021 03:08:15 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l7G15-001c7c-VW; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:08:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:08:11 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hans de Goede Cc: Platform Driver , Mark Gross , Patrik Jakobsson , dri-devel , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ib-drm-gpio-pdx86-rtc-wdt-v5.12-1 Message-ID: References: <886bbdc0-3391-2140-a2d4-1688b262966f@redhat.com> <8d350b8c-5f1d-256d-cdc5-8501af0c0cad@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8d350b8c-5f1d-256d-cdc5-8501af0c0cad@redhat.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 11:35:59AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 2/3/21 10:54 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:23 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On 1/26/21 1:38 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> This is first part of Intel MID outdated platforms removal. It's collected into > >>> immutable branch with a given tag, please pull to yours subsystems. > >>> > >>> (All changes are tagged by the respective maintainers) > > > >> Erm, I already have this 2 in platform-drivers-x86/for-next since you said that > >> these 2 could be merged independently. > >> > >> Anyways I just did a test-merge and there is no conflict, so everything is ok. > >> > >> From my pov this looks good and I plan to merge this into platform-drivers-x86/for-next > >> before the merge-window. > >> > >> I'm going to hold off on doing that for a bit for now in case one of the other > >> subsys maintainers has any objections. > > > > Any news on this? Have you pulled it somewhere (I don't see it in Linux next)? > > I was going through all pending pdx86 stuff yesterday to prep for the upcoming > merge-window. I was doing so in FIFO order and I ran out of steam just as I got > to this pull-req. > > So today is a new day and after sending out a fixes pull-req for 5.11 this is > (was) the first thing on my list. > > I've merged this into my review-hans now (and I will push it to for-next soon). > > I did one last check of all the commits after merging, and I found one small > issue. > > The "gpio: msic: Remove driver for deprecated platform" commit forgets to > drop the Makefile line for the msic driver: > > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MSIC) += gpio-msic.o > > This is not a reason to redo the entire branch, but it would be good if you > can do a follow up patch to fix this. Indeed. Thanks for catching this, I'll fixed locally and will send it soon. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko