From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DD6C47084 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 13:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363CD6141B for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 13:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233096AbhEYNKu (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 09:10:50 -0400 Received: from mslow1.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.240]:58665 "EHLO mslow1.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232862AbhEYNKt (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 09:10:49 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (unknown [217.70.183.199]) by mslow1.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8985CC9447; Tue, 25 May 2021 13:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59780FF812; Tue, 25 May 2021 13:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:08:52 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: "Vaittinen, Matti" Cc: "wim@linux-watchdog.org" , "sre@kernel.org" , "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-power , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mturquette@baylibre.com" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux@roeck-us.net" , "a.zummo@towertech.it" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "bgolaszewski@baylibre.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "lee.jones@linaro.org" , "sboyd@kernel.org" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] rtc: bd70528: Drop BD70528 support Message-ID: References: <2beaa677bde0f9516f366b97e91419598f1dfde4.1621937490.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> <83c091bef8adecd06a5c6fac9c86ca572bcc06d4.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83c091bef8adecd06a5c6fac9c86ca572bcc06d4.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 25/05/2021 11:59:58+0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > And in any case applying the MFD and RTC patches should be synced. RTC > parts should be applied before MFD parts because few other PMICs use > this same RTC driver and compilation would fail with missing headers if > MFD was removed before RTC changes are applied. > > Suggestions on how to guarantee the order of MFD and RTC - and how to > resolve conflicts? > The easiest is to take the RTC patches in one cycle and the rest in the next cycle. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com