From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88EBC433FE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239139AbhLGPsG (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:48:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34930 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239126AbhLGPsF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:48:05 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31065C061756 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id y196so11107436wmc.3 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 07:44:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=GDbc4h38L7Xqu5Gkd11iZTTBGBAs0PJyND5cTN2uSK4=; b=JL1eItc2fbu2q5yOpYsMZm6ITJf67rhjlzwho9wAoBRtevh2CFW5DJdTp2MeeiyK6C r2CQyQCk+0gqyEeZvrKZUKIe/HFOqo24k1FrVKvG2OQ9P/GLOVgzmgaQTikWfN6uoNQ6 s6se+7S04BjNNrw/FpvIZ2W1BRu85ARudjZifAh1mYBAESTJRqJEGFXfN7kzJ3cL4UaF 1iueBwY5Hqq4jHwbrv2H4IUGrBdmFmBOcpwYSfb5GAV5cIEpGZLMVc+oRVABkSfVGxF7 O0z/vuAGjeS7XivvcDvrlRGEsLjRBL2A4SvQs4oo0n4X+0rmjgVPVPapblSu8o2g7ImX STkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=GDbc4h38L7Xqu5Gkd11iZTTBGBAs0PJyND5cTN2uSK4=; b=on4XRZMj0kXlZK2htpOIekh/3+SmLa28YhDOgQg7emddo9XcPyK2baBv2TIXHxZxVQ ZL844WiEXSbvLFQmi9wLYb8xntIizSTZT9F9/9BSP67ukJyMeXwZ8bPbE3PheReSbIlw KDGONdBquRC8p/pxpfS9jax1/U6CwQb3+mQY64RJhWOzcFpfVBmbxullwbsSaCnAs0Es ZjVuKOrtLSER6XwKEH+kNRrtEiM3ScTUVmp/G9lld342v4ZbpgldN6jRVot2lSdipTyO Yt+DIkHbRTU8TWL6GVNYregqM9OL7H4rJQhtDbH/S4tV8H2QYVjrIjaph6YNLY7ZtHc4 Xv4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ywj1i2UxmhLWjfBjQ7hXt0k9wIZYUiz6Db1GjOoi0kBaw3FjI 8iuKfvDn9QR3vLQ3hGMmfNFEpQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/ZnhwcGRzecvHHBydUJbGZHREqRCw4qtiHqzsKgHW4meOqCidqlbNDTAow1lOhlUS7zopjw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3c91:: with SMTP id bg17mr8111276wmb.80.1638891873696; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 07:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2.31.167.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s8sm86023wra.9.2021.12.07.07.44.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Dec 2021 07:44:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:44:31 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Florian Fainelli , =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Wim Van Sebroeck , Rob Herring , Justin Chen , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Message-ID: References: <432664af-5660-aaad-bf75-81e4d61cb078@roeck-us.net> <46a88b40-6d92-727c-7adc-5723921d08e3@gmail.com> <20211206195115.GC3759192@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > [ ... ] > > > It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that > > > > Not exactly, I said: > > > > "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well. > > > > If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch." > > > > The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable > > branch to you, which I am in a position to do. > > > > I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree > isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next. > If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be > completely up to him. > > I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial > tree, so maybe this is a non-issue. That doesn't help, sadly. I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this patch makes it into his tree. I'll take the MFD one at the same time and the two shall meet in -next. Honestly, this is all such a faff. Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog