Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-binding: watchdog: add more Rockchip compatibles to snps,dw-wdt.yaml

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>, "Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org, jamie@jamieiles.com,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-binding: watchdog: add more Rockchip compatibles to snps,dw-wdt.yaml
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 06:56:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff9b0625-2892-3df9-a31e-c23a8c94e10b@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2221632.MzOyzyC30C@diego>

On 1/26/21 12:37 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> Am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2021, 05:55:59 CET schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>> On 1/25/21 3:40 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 23. Januar 2021, 18:34:01 CET schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 01:05:27PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
>>>>> The watchdog compatible strings are suppose to be SoC orientated.
>>>>> In the more recently added Rockchip SoC dtsi files only
>>>>> the fallback string "snps,dw-wdt" is used, so add the following
>>>>> compatible strings:
>>>>>
>>>>> "rockchip,px30-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3228-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3308-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3328-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3399-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rv1108-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>>
>>>>> make ARCH=arm dtbs_check
>>>>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
>>>>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>
>>> just to clarify, do you expect me to pick up the dt-binding patch
>>> with the devicetree patches or do you want to take this individual
>>> patch through the watchdog tree instead?
>>>
>>
>> You'd have to ask Wim since he takes care of actually sending pull requests.
>> But didn't you say earlier that you wanted to apply the rest of the series
>> after this one is applied through the watchdog tree ?
> 
> Yep that was my intent, though somehow I mistook you as also being
> a watchdog maintainer, hence the confusion.
> 

I am, but Wim sends all pull requests.

Guenter

> So I'll wait for Wim to apply this patch and then I'll take the rest of
> the series.
> 
> Thanks
> Heiko
> 
> 
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>> index f7ee9229c..b58596b18 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>> @@ -18,10 +18,16 @@ properties:
>>>>>        - const: snps,dw-wdt
>>>>>        - items:
>>>>>            - enum:
>>>>> +              - rockchip,px30-wdt
>>>>>                - rockchip,rk3066-wdt
>>>>>                - rockchip,rk3188-wdt
>>>>> +              - rockchip,rk3228-wdt
>>>>>                - rockchip,rk3288-wdt
>>>>> +              - rockchip,rk3308-wdt
>>>>> +              - rockchip,rk3328-wdt
>>>>>                - rockchip,rk3368-wdt
>>>>> +              - rockchip,rk3399-wdt
>>>>> +              - rockchip,rv1108-wdt
>>>>>            - const: snps,dw-wdt
>>>>>  
>>>>>    reg:
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 