From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: ivan.kuten@promwad.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Yauhen Kharuzhy <yauhen.kharuzhy@promwad.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: Compare ethernet addresses by unaligned safe way
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:58:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246262320.5947.3.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A475F82.9040007@promwad.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3071 bytes --]
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 15:18 +0300, Ivan Kuten wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In net/wireless/scan.c : cfg80211_wext_siwscan there seems also unaligned allocations
> for creq->ssids and creq->channels. Should it be something like that?
Seems alright, but there is more than one instance of this, maybe you
can make a function to allocate a scan request properly and have it be
called from all the places it's needed.
johannes
> Modified: trunk/uClinux-dist-2008R1-RC8/compat-wireless-2009-06-11/net/wireless/scan.c
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/uClinux-dist-2008R1-RC8/compat-wireless-2009-06-11/net/wireless/scan.c (original)
> +++ trunk/uClinux-dist-2008R1-RC8/compat-wireless-2009-06-11/net/wireless/scan.c Fri Jun 26 14:00:52 2009
> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@
> if (wiphy->bands[band])
> n_channels += wiphy->bands[band]->n_channels;
>
> - creq = kzalloc(sizeof(*creq) + sizeof(struct cfg80211_ssid) +
> + creq = kzalloc(roundup(sizeof(*creq), 4) + roundup(sizeof(struct cfg80211_ssid), 4) +
> n_channels * sizeof(void *),
> GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!creq) {
> @@ -629,8 +629,8 @@
>
> creq->wiphy = wiphy;
> creq->ifidx = dev->ifindex;
> - creq->ssids = (void *)(creq + 1);
> - creq->channels = (void *)(creq->ssids + 1);
> + creq->ssids = (void *)creq + roundup(sizeof(*creq), 4);
> + creq->channels = (void *)creq->ssids + roundup(sizeof(*creq->ssids), 4);
> creq->n_channels = n_channels;
> creq->n_ssids = 1;
>
> Regards,
> Ivan
>
> > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 13:54 +0300, Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
> >> When we try to run RTL8187 driver on AD BlackFin platform, we got
> >> messages from kernel about unaligned memory access at
> >> compare_ether_addr() calls.
> >>
> >> Replacing of compare_ether_addr() by memcmp() fixes this problem.
> >
> > This shouldn't be necessary. Which operand is unaligned?
> >
> >> --- a/net/mac80211/ibss.c
> >> +++ b/net/mac80211/ibss.c
> >> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ struct sta_info *ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (compare_ether_addr(bssid, sdata->u.ibss.bssid))
> >> + if (memcmp(bssid, sdata->u.ibss.bssid, ETH_ALEN))
> >> return NULL;
> >
> > So in this case it seems that it is possible that u.ibss.bssid is not
> > aligned, consider fixing by doing
> >
> > --- ieee80211_i.h
> > +++ ieee80211_i.h
> > - u8 bssid[ETH_ALEN];
> > + u8 bssid[ETH_ALEN] __align(2);
> >
> > or so instead.
> >
> >> --- a/net/wireless/scan.c
> >> +++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
> >> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static bool is_bss(struct cfg80211_bss *a,
> >> {
> >> const u8 *ssidie;
> >>
> >> - if (bssid && compare_ether_addr(a->bssid, bssid))
> >> + if (bssid && memcmp(a->bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))
> >
> > Since a->bssid is after a pointer I can't see how it would be unaligned,
> > and bssid should be unaligned only if the call trace shows it's coming
> > from the above u.ibss.bssid.
> >
> > johannes
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 10:54 [PATCH] wireless: Compare ethernet addresses by unaligned safe way Yauhen Kharuzhy
2009-06-16 11:14 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-28 12:18 ` Ivan Kuten
2009-06-29 7:58 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2009-07-23 17:56 ` Ivan Kuten
2009-07-23 17:59 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-07 15:34 ` John W. Linville
2009-06-29 8:23 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246262320.5947.3.camel@johannes.local \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=ivan.kuten@promwad.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yauhen.kharuzhy@promwad.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).