On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 10:24 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 08/01/2009 10:21 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Actually, jiffies are unsigned long
> 
> Yeah, this is what I meant. I agree I messed it up when I didn't write
> the unsigned explicitly. It might have been confusing, thanks for
> pointing out.

And, in addition to what you said, the code shouldn't divide jiffies, it
should multiply the timeout, add it to the start time, and then use
time_is_after_jiffies() or so.

johannes