From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:25731 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753229Ab0CZCsR (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:48:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 21/22] iwlwifi: change spin_lock to spin_lock_irqsave From: Zhu Yi To: Pavel Roskin Cc: "Chatre, Reinette" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: <1269551457.2626.12.camel@mj> References: <1269549890-19195-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1269549890-19195-22-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1269551457.2626.12.camel@mj> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:49:02 +0800 Message-ID: <1269571742.4043.161.camel@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 05:10 +0800, Pavel Roskin wrote: > As far as I understand, spin_lock_irqsave() is superfluous in > interrupt handlers, since interrupt handlers are run with interrupts > disabled. spin_lock_irqsave is required if multiple interrupts are used, i.e. MSI-X. IOAPIC only guarantees the same interrupt line is disabled during the isr. Thanks, -yi