From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:57813 "EHLO
	sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756410Ab0G3MNP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:13:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hw scan fixes
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20100730113045.923567583@sipsolutions.net>
References: <20100730113045.923567583@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:14:31 +0200
Message-ID: <1280492071.3710.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 13:30 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

> Technically these are 2.6.35 regressions, but
> I guess it's a little late?

Wait, no, only the iwlwifi one is a regression.

johannes