From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:40314 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753062AbdIGGpW (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 02:45:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1504766720.23905.25.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20170907_084528_738737_870019AC) Subject: Re: VLAN/bridge "compression" in wifi (was: Re: [PATCH 3/8] qtnfmac: implement AP_VLAN iftype support) From: Johannes Berg To: Sergey Matyukevich Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev , Igor Mitsyanko , Avinash Patil Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:45:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170906154522.twtesbo2rxbrhekf@bars> References: <20170620195517.18373-1-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <20170620195517.18373-4-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <1504619151.12380.16.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1504621233.12380.21.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20170906154522.twtesbo2rxbrhekf@bars> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, > > To clarify, I think what you - conceptually - want is the following > > topology: > > > >         +--- eth0.1  ---  br.1  ---  wlan0.1 > >         | > > eth0 ---+--- eth0.2  ---  br.2  ---  wlan0.2 > >         | > >         +--- eth0.3  ---  br.3  ---  wlan0.3 [...] > That's right. In fact, hostapd is able to create this kind of network > bridge infrastructure automatically when it is built > with CONFIG_FULL_DYNAMIC_VLAN option enabled. Cool, I was unaware of the exact functionality of this build-time option. :) > > Now, you seem to want to compress this to > > > >                   +---  wlan0.1 > >                   | > > eth0  ---  br  ---+---  wlan0.2 > >                   | > >                   +---  wlan0.3 [...] > Exactly. And yes, the only purpose of this 'non-conventional' mode > was to have 802.1Q acceleration on the ethernet port. Right. You can still have acceleration in the top picture by placing the feature into the Ethernet hardware, so that tagging/untagging doesn't have to touch the packet data but just touches (skb) metadata. But obviously that's something that happens on the other side and you don't have control over it. Anyway, I'm happy we cleared up what was going on and also that you decided to leave it for now and work with the regular Linux topology model. Thanks, johannes