From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from paleale.coelho.fi ([176.9.41.70]:47976 "EHLO farmhouse.coelho.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbdK2IUw (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 03:20:52 -0500 Message-ID: <1511943649.4827.20.camel@coelho.fi> (sfid-20171129_092056_716493_020D7BF3) From: Luca Coelho To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linuxwifi Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:20:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1511175768.4011.261.camel@coelho.fi> <1511259055.4011.268.camel@coelho.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: pull-request: iwlwifi 2017-11-19 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 08:51 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Luca Coelho wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:30 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Luca Coelho > > > wrote: > > > [..] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > --- > > > > iwlwifi: first set of fixes for 4.15 > > > > > > > > * Support new FW API version of scan cmd (used in FW version > > > > 34); > > > > > > While seeing this... > > > I have here a iwlwifi-8265 hardware and have seen a recently > > > uploaded > > > FW-version 34 in iwlwifi-firmware Git. > > > Can you explain the dependence of iwlwifi firmware-version / > > > Linux > > > kernel-release and especially probing? > > > Currently, I am using Linux v4.14 from Debian/experimental. > > > > Mostly for backwards-compatibility, the driver is able to work with > > a > > range of firmware versions. It only uses one of them at a time > > (i.e. > > the highest supported version it finds). > > > > The driver in v4.14 support version 34 and below. So it starts > > looking > > for that one and, if not found, falls back to the next lower > > version > > (i.e. 33) and so on, until it finds one. > > > > Isn't Linux v4.14.3 (here: -rc1) minimum to completely support new > features in v34 firmware? Yes, it is. But this was a bug and we can't go back and fix v4.14.0-2, right? So it's the best we can do and whoever is using v4.14, should update to v4.14.3 when it comes out to be able to use version 34 of the firmware. -- Cheers, Luca.