From: <yhchuang@realtek.com>
To: <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>, <tehuang@realtek.com>,
<briannorris@chromium.org>, <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 24/24] rtw88: 8822b: turn rtw_write32s_mask into macro
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:21:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1548937297-14660-25-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548937297-14660-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com>
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
The inlined rtw_write32s_mask has to check range of addr with
BUILD_BUG_ON. But with some variants of gcc version the function might
not get inlined, and it will have no idea to know how to do, then
results in a compile error. Turn it into a macro to make sure the values
are known when compile time.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c | 10 ----------
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c
index c0e5d1f..22b880a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c
@@ -224,16 +224,6 @@ static int rtw8822b_mac_init(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
return 0;
}
-static inline void
-rtw_write32s_mask(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 addr, u32 mask, u32 data)
-{
- BUILD_BUG_ON(addr < 0xC00 || addr >= 0xD00);
-
- rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, addr, mask, data);
- /* 0xC00-0xCFF and 0xE00-0xEFF have the same layout */
- rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, addr + 0x200, mask, data);
-}
-
static void rtw8822b_set_channel_rfe_efem(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 channel)
{
struct rtw_hal *hal = &rtwdev->hal;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.h
index 311fe8a..4cf193b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.h
@@ -97,6 +97,21 @@ struct rtw8822b_efuse {
};
};
+static inline void
+_rtw_write32s_mask(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 addr, u32 mask, u32 data)
+{
+ rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, addr, mask, data);
+ rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, addr + 0x200, mask, data);
+}
+
+/* 0xC00-0xCFF and 0xE00-0xEFF have the same layout */
+#define rtw_write32s_mask(rtwdev, addr, mask, data) \
+ do { \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(addr < 0xC00 || addr >= 0xD00); \
+ \
+ _rtw_write32s_mask(rtwdev, addr, mask, data); \
+ } while (0)
+
/* phy status page0 */
#define GET_PHY_STAT_P0_PWDB(phy_stat) \
le32_get_bits(*((__le32 *)(phy_stat) + 0x00), GENMASK(15, 8))
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 12:21 [PATCH 00/24] rtw88: major fixes for 8822c to have stable functionalities yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 01/24] rtw88: report correct tx status if mac80211 requested one yhchuang
2019-02-09 3:08 ` Brian Norris
2019-02-11 4:31 ` Tony Chuang
2019-02-11 19:21 ` Brian Norris
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 02/24] rtw88: add get_c2h_from_skb for extracting c2h commands yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 03/24] rtw88: can not support vif beacon filter actually yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 04/24] rtw88: fix incorrect bit definition for RF mode yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 05/24] rtw88: add a delay after writing a rf register yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 06/24] rtw88: 8822c: correct crystal setting yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 07/24] rtw88: 8822c: update efuse table as released yhchuang
2019-02-01 2:26 ` Brian Norris
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 08/24] rtw88: 8822c: update pwr_seq to v12 yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 09/24] rtw88: 8822c: update phy parameter to v27 yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 10/24] rtw88: 8822c: update channel setting yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 11/24] rtw88: 8822c: update trx mode setting yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 12/24] rtw88: add module param to switch lps supportability yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 13/24] rtw88: add 8822c tx power index table parsing support yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 14/24] rtw88: add 8822c tx agc support yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 15/24] rtw88: extract utility functions into util.c yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 16/24] rtw88: 8822c: add support for DACK yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 17/24] rtw88: 8822c: fix RSC setting yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 18/24] rtw88: 8822c: set ack timeout yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 19/24] rtw88: 8822c: do not reset MAC Rx before sending CCK packet yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 20/24] rtw88: 8822c: parse packet by sigb length yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 21/24] rtw88: do not count dummy tail into rx counter yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 22/24] rtw88: set OFDM ctx to receive ack after cts2self yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 23/24] rtw88: fix slot time value yhchuang
2019-01-31 12:21 ` yhchuang [this message]
2019-02-01 1:24 ` [PATCH 24/24] rtw88: 8822b: turn rtw_write32s_mask into macro Brian Norris
2019-02-11 2:29 ` Tony Chuang
2019-02-01 2:40 ` [PATCH 00/24] rtw88: major fixes for 8822c to have stable functionalities Brian Norris
2019-02-11 2:30 ` Tony Chuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1548937297-14660-25-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com \
--to=yhchuang@realtek.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=tehuang@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).